That's probably not so far off, Magilla. Maybe not a game, but more of a benign statement. It was supposed to be an advisory referendum, and maybe a significant percentage - say ten percent - didn't think Great Britain would go through with such a drastic measure even if "Leave" won. Nor did they believe all the economists warnings that this would greatly harm the country. They have eggs and bangers on their faces now. I'm growing more and more convinced that they're not going to leave after all, and if so many people have buyer's remorse, all the better. If GB grows more reluctant to leave, maybe they'll be more reluctant to elect Boris Johnson and the French more reluctant to elect Le Pen, etc. This may be overly optimistic, but I hope I'm right.Big Magilla wrote:What amazes me most about this is the number of people who wanted to know if they could change their vote after the fact, claiming that they expected the "remain" vote to win but wanted to make a statement with their vote. Did they think they were playing some kind of game?
I don't blame anyone for making worst-case scenarios, though. Everyone seems to be startled by what happened.
MIster Tee, since you singled out 1962-74, I thought you meant Sam Cooke.