NBR Winners

1998 through 2007
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6398
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

criddic3 wrote:anonymous, I have to nitpick. You forgot to bold Juliette Binoche, Frances McDormand and Jack Nicholson. They all went on to win the Oscar in 1996 and 1997, respectively.

Does Jack have any chance this year, or is The Bucket List just a fluke?
And Hilary Swank in Breakthrough as well. I've corrected them.

I think The Bucket List is a fluke.

Speaking of Rob Reiner, I seem to remember an interview that he did after he was snubbed for Best Director for A Few Good Men. He said he'd like the Best Director category be abolished and instead, have the director and producer accept the Oscar for Best Picture.

Anyone agree with this sentiment?
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

And it's not like the data isn't on my site (though still in need of some formatting and to have 1996 included...but whatever.

Call me stubborn all you want, but without more major critics attention, I think she still has an uphill battle.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

anonymous, I have to nitpick. You forgot to bold Juliette Binoche, Frances McDormand and Jack Nicholson. They all went on to win the Oscar in 1996 and 1997, respectively.

Does Jack have any chance this year, or is The Bucket List just a fluke?
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3807
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Post by dws1982 »

Damien wrote:And while I liked Hal Holbrook's much-buzzed performance in the movie, I was even more impressed by Brian Dierker (Keener's "old man"). According to IMDb, this is his first picture/ Anyone know his background?

Agree about Keener, who I've never really cared much for, but who really got past the smugness here and was, like you said, both heartbreaking and wise.

Here's an article about Brian Dierker.

Dierker runs Adventure Sports Services, an Arizona company that helps filmmakers and commercial directors shoot rafting and kayaking scenes on the Colorado River and through the Grand Canyon. "Wild" director Sean Penn hired Dierker to scout locations and drive a camera boat, and the two became friends. That friendship led Penn to offer Dierker a part in the movie.

"I was flattered, but I turned him down," Dierker says. "He can be pretty persuasive, though."

Penn wanted Dierker to play Rainey, a middle-age hippie nomad who travels the country with his beloved partner, a free-spirited earth mother named Jan (Catherine Keener). The two meet the movie's hero, Chris McCandless, early in his travels and they form a fast, enduring bond.

Dierker has just a few scenes in the movie, but he steals every one of them, making Rainey a man who provides both comfort and comic relief.

"He's amazing," says actress Kristen Stewart, who shared screen time with Dierker. "Those lines weren't scripted. I read the script and I don't know where they came from. But boy when he speaks, he puts across a feeling that's just beautiful."

Dierker worked with Penn on his dialogue, modeling Rainey on men he met and times he had while living a "fairly non-structured" life in the 1970s and 1980s.

"A lot of Vietnam vets came to the Grand Canyon in the 1970s to be boatmen," Dierker says. "It was an off-the-cuff, free-spirited life."

A life far from movie premieres and parties like the ones Dierker has attended recently in Toronto and Hollywood.

"Well, it's been fun," Dierker says. "For me, the best moment was sitting next to Hal Holbrook at the premiere in Toronto. It was an honor to be seated next to that man, and when I saw tears well up in his eyes watching the movie, I was sure glad that Sean asked me to be in the movie."




Edited By dws1982 on 1196913153
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Big Magilla wrote:Changing gears, I think the one who's in the most trouble is Cate Blanchett. "The performance of the year" they're calling it on those other boards which I only take a peripheral glance at now and then, but enough to be sick of her and her film without even seeign it. She loses to Amy Ryan.
What I find perplexing is that no one has been mentioning Catherine Keener in Into The Wild. I just saw it today, and it's such a lovely performance; subtly heartbreaking and wise, and so much more impressive than her nominated yawn-inducing work as Harper Lee in Capote. It's a classic Supporting type performance.

And while I liked Hal Holbrook's much-buzzed performance in the movie, I was even more impressed by Brian Dierker (Keener's "old man"). According to IMDb, this is his first picture/ Anyone know his background?
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Mister Tee
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8675
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by Mister Tee »

Damien wrote:
Mister Tee wrote:Bourne making the list may be baffling to all the He-Man-Greengrass-Haters-Club members here,

LMAO, and love from Alfalfa, Spanky, Buckwheat and Porky! Of course, Alfalfa dressed up in drag and went to see Bourne 3 on opening day.
Thank you, Damien. I'm glad someone got my reference.

A few more takes, upon reflection and in reaction:

I didn't have There Will Be Blood in my predicted ten because I presumed it would be the divisive sort of film the NBR has skipped over in the past. The film's Oscar hopes are probably with the writers and directors, not best picture, and Day-Lewis, though he seems a likely nominee, will just be one of several contenders for the actual win.

I likewise figured I'm Not There wouldn't be to NBR's taste (any movie Rex Reed despises was sure to hit NBRers the same way), which is why I predicted Amy Ryan to win. I think Blanchett, barring a shutout from the real critics, is still a shoo-in nominee, but Ryan, or some other more user-friendly candidate, is more likely to take the statue in February.

And Oscar Guy, you're really being stubborn on this: Ryan is getting nominated for sure.

Let's wait on the other critics before crowning Christie (however deserving she may be); I think Linney is still a possible contender. I may not even stop thinking that till after the Globes.

As Magilla more or less points out, The English Patient looked in dire trouble after it lost NBR, and then did even worse with the other critics' groups, but went on to a nine-Oscar triumph. So I don't see how Atonement -- which did make the list, after all -- is suddenly in such jeopardy.
User avatar
Eric
Tenured
Posts: 2749
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by Eric »

Akash wrote:Not really, no.
I haven't been moved by McAvoy myself yet, either. Except this still has me thinking there is always the possibility ...
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3807
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Post by dws1982 »

anonymous wrote:
dws1982 wrote:
BEST DIRECTOR: Tim Burton will either get nominated and win or not get nominated at all.

Illogic like that makes no sense to me at all.

I said if the pattern holds up. The past two directors that won in NBR also won the Oscar.
But those are events that--like snubs of Michael Mann and Edward Zwick, the two previous winners in that category--are unrelated to, and independent of, Tim Burton's win.
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6398
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

dws1982 wrote:
BEST DIRECTOR: Tim Burton will either get nominated and win or not get nominated at all.

Illogic like that makes no sense to me at all.
I said if the pattern holds up. The past two directors that won in NBR also won the Oscar.
ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN

Post by ITALIANO »

dws1982 wrote:
BEST DIRECTOR: Tim Burton will either get nominated and win or not get nominated at all.

Illogic like that makes no sense to me at all.
Not only to you.
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3807
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Post by dws1982 »

anonymous wrote:Don't thank me. Thank the Backstage's Big Ted.
I've seen him lurking here recently; I hope he knows he's welcome to join in the discussion.
BEST DIRECTOR: Tim Burton will either get nominated and win or not get nominated at all.

Illogic like that makes no sense to me at all.
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6398
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

cam wrote:Thanks for this, anonymous!
Don't thank me. Thank the Backstage's Big Ted.

I must say, if the pattern holds up, this is how I see the Oscar race right now:


BEST PICTURE: No Country for Old Men's nod is somewhat secure but a win may still be out of reach unless it starts sweeping the precursors.

BEST DIRECTOR: Tim Burton will either get nominated and win or not get nominated at all.

BEST ACTOR: A nomination seems very likely for Clooney. A win? Only if he starts sweeping the subsequent precursors.

BEST ACTRESS: Julie Christie will surely be nominated. A win is still iffy.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Casey Affleck's nomination is likely but his win isn't.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: The NBR's track record here is pretty abysmal so Amy Ryan's chances are still 50/50 unless she wins more precursors.
Penelope
Site Admin
Posts: 5663
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Tampa, FL, USA

Post by Penelope »

Just a quick comment before I go to bed.

Stats are fine, but I have to admit that, right now, the NBR list looks like it could very well duplicate at the Oscars.

It seems to me that Best Picture is currently shaping into a three-way race between No Country, Sweeney Todd and Atonement; and I'm thinking that Michael Clayton could very well end up a Best Pic nominee--taking American Gangster aside (which actually had a strong young urban male appeal, naturally), Clayton was the most successful of the fall's serious adult dramas and the Academy will take note of that.

But will that translate into a Best Actor nod for Clooney? Possibly--he's well-liked and respected, a previous Oscar winner, and the success of his film proves that he is truly a genuine movie star.

Julie Christie can pretty much start rehearsing her Oscar speech--but keeping an occasional glance over her shoulder, but not a worrisome glance.

Casey Affleck looks to be in the running for Supporting Actor--yes, the category confusion could work against him, but it seems, sadly, that everyone else is buying the concept of his Lead character being Supporting, so why not the Academy? I still think it's Javier Bardem's to lose, but Affleck's nomination will be not only a reflection of his great performance but his emergence this year as one of our best young actors.

And I think Amy Ryan is pretty well in for a Supporting Actress nomination; this is a category that is seemingly more comfortable with unsympathetic characters (see: Shelley Winters in A Patch of Blue, Angelina Jolie in Girl, Interrupted) so she could win.
"...it is the weak who are cruel, and...gentleness is only to be expected from the strong." - Leo Reston

"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster
cam
Assistant
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Coquitlam BC Canada

Post by cam »

I wouldn't discount Bourne Identity, just because it came out early in the year. It was a five-star film, and is still playing at first-run houses.
ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 4076
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN

Post by ITALIANO »

Big Magilla wrote:On the other hand, No Country and Sweeny could cancel each other out and the prize could still fall to Atonement.
I don't see what No Country and Sweeny have in common so that they could cancel each other. They seem to be completely different movies, except maybe for the fact that they are both works by critically regarded directors, but then this could influence the Best Director race, not Best Picture.

While I agree with you that Cate Blanchett's fans too soon have predicted for her an Oscar which might not happen this year, we must admit that the NBR was the group less likely to appreciate and give an award to a movie like I'm Still There. Her fate will be decided by the critics' prizes, and I think that a nomination at least (especially in a category like Best Supporting Actress which this year doesn't seem impossibly crowded) is almost sure.

As for the Best Picture category, even more than last year it's difficult, at this moment, to see clearly through it. Both No Country for Old Men and Atonement should be there. And it is true that Sweeny Todd could be another strong contender. The other two? At this point I'd go for Michael Collins in fourth place and, in fifth, Into the Wild or The Kite Runner or one which hasn't made the NBR's list - Away from Her could be a possibility. But it's really too early still.
Post Reply

Return to “The 8th Decade”