I was teaching English to Grade 10(sophomores to Americans) Mockingbird in 1976, and during an Easter break went to Perth Western Australia. I decided to visit a high school( it happened to be Hollywood High School!) where I met with an English teacher and discovered that they were teaching To Kill A Mockingbird there as well, to grade 10s.
During my teaching career , I ran into many parents who felt it necessary to protect their little darlings from the world. I remember once in 1985 I was reamed out by a parent for teaching Albee's Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf to senior theatre students. Even Julius Caesar and Hick Finn came under fire during this time.
There will always be such people. We should not be surprised.
Idiot student protests "racist" anti-racist book - Idiot mom thinks book should be "banned"
Agreed -- this is sort of the height of ridiculous. To Kill a Mockingbird has the notorious distinction of being one of the most banned books in schools and libraries yet also one of the most read books by high school students. It's a book that will ALWAYS cause controversy.OscarGuy wrote:When a book about a white man standing up for a black man during a very racist period in American history can be deemed racist, it's time to put political correctness to bed.
Check out the non-fiction book 'Mockingbird: A Portrait of Harper Lee' for an in-depth look at the book's, as well as the author's, complicated history.
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-
OscarGuy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13668
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
- Location: Springfield, MO
- Contact:
When a book about a white man standing up for a black man during a very racist period in American history can be deemed racist, it's time to put political correctness to bed.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
From the Lancashire Evening Post in the UK:
Pupil walks out over 'racist book' scenes
03 March 2009
A pupil walked out of school in protest at the novel To Kill A Mockingbird, describing it as "racially offensive".
Tinashe Makunike - the only black student in his class - says he felt uncomfortable at the use of racist language by characters in the GCSE set text.
The novel is taught in schools across the country and is widely regarded as an anti-racist classic which exposes prejudice in Depression-era America.
But 16-year-old prefect Tinashe, a high-achieving pupil who hopes to become a doctor, says he has previously experienced racist taunts at the school and reading the book in class made him feel "inferior and undermined".
He quit lessons at Holy Family College in Heywood, Rochdale, after a drama company acted out scenes from the text using the word 'n*****'.
He had already complained about studying it and his requests to read an alternative text were refused.
Published in 1960, the novel recounts the fictional trial of a black worker in an American small town who is wrongly accused of attacking a white woman.
Author Harper Lee won the Pulitzer Prize for the novel, which was turned into an Oscar-winning film, starring Gregory Peck as the liberal lawyer Atticus Finch.
Teachers argue that the book is highly critical of racism and the point of studying it is to challenge racism.
But Tinashe, from Heywood, said: "My mum explained to the teachers that I wasn't happy about it, but I still had to sit through a drama where people were using those words.
"People speak like that in real life but we can study that in history or politics, there is no need to make up fictional stories about it.
"Books like this do nothing to alleviate or reduce racism, but have contributed negatively to the school community with me getting the worst impact of its negativity.
"This type of book only creates and incites hate, violence and racism among races due to terms used in them, which are grossly degrading.
"Times have changed. Racist fiction should be buried in the past."
Tinashe said that after he complained, a pupil reading the book out in class was told to apologise to him after a character in the novel used racist language.
The teenager, who is studying eight GCSEs and some advanced exams, recently started attending lessons following a 10-day walkout.
His class have finished To Kill A Mocking Bird, but he will still have to study it for his GCSE exam.
Tinashe has been at the school for four years and until this incident had a good record. Last Friday he was excluded following unconnected allegations that he disobeyed his teacher. He refutes the accusation.
Tinashe's family are backing him. Mum Thelma said: "He asked the English teacher to say that the terms used were not right. The teacher asked if he would like to use another word such as black.
"It was not necessary to put him in that position. I said to the headteacher that it wouldn't make any difference because in literature you have to quote the words as they are and therefore if you change it, it is pointless.
"Such books should be banned. This has affected his grades because he was getting A stars and his grades have now gone down to C and D because of pressure."
Headteacher Susan Casey said her staff had approached the subject sensitively and any incidents of racism in the school had been dealt with severely.
She said: "While the student was not able to have a choice of which two books he studied because this decision was teacher-led, we did inform the student ahead of him reading To Kill A Mocking Bird of its prejudicial nature and that it did contain a racially-offensive word.
"Both texts allow teachers to address issues of prejudice so our students can gain a better understanding of its historical context. If the student felt uncomfortable at any time he had the option to approach me or his English teacher so we could discuss it.
"We are extremely concerned about the student's education as he has not attended lessons since scenes from To Kill A Mocking Bird were staged in school by an outside theatre company.
"We have a duty to provide education to our young people, but we do have a clear attendance policy and we are concerned by the student's absence as he is at a pivotal point in his GCSE education."
* PUBLISHED in 1960, To Kill A Mockingbird examines racial prejudice in America. It tells the story of Tom Robinson, a black man wrongly accused of rape, and Atticus Finch, the lawyer who defends him.The Pulitzer Prize-winning book has never been out of print. Author Harper Lee based the novel on true stories from her youth. It was made into a film in 1962, starring Gregory Peck as Finch, which won three Oscars.
Pupil walks out over 'racist book' scenes
03 March 2009
A pupil walked out of school in protest at the novel To Kill A Mockingbird, describing it as "racially offensive".
Tinashe Makunike - the only black student in his class - says he felt uncomfortable at the use of racist language by characters in the GCSE set text.
The novel is taught in schools across the country and is widely regarded as an anti-racist classic which exposes prejudice in Depression-era America.
But 16-year-old prefect Tinashe, a high-achieving pupil who hopes to become a doctor, says he has previously experienced racist taunts at the school and reading the book in class made him feel "inferior and undermined".
He quit lessons at Holy Family College in Heywood, Rochdale, after a drama company acted out scenes from the text using the word 'n*****'.
He had already complained about studying it and his requests to read an alternative text were refused.
Published in 1960, the novel recounts the fictional trial of a black worker in an American small town who is wrongly accused of attacking a white woman.
Author Harper Lee won the Pulitzer Prize for the novel, which was turned into an Oscar-winning film, starring Gregory Peck as the liberal lawyer Atticus Finch.
Teachers argue that the book is highly critical of racism and the point of studying it is to challenge racism.
But Tinashe, from Heywood, said: "My mum explained to the teachers that I wasn't happy about it, but I still had to sit through a drama where people were using those words.
"People speak like that in real life but we can study that in history or politics, there is no need to make up fictional stories about it.
"Books like this do nothing to alleviate or reduce racism, but have contributed negatively to the school community with me getting the worst impact of its negativity.
"This type of book only creates and incites hate, violence and racism among races due to terms used in them, which are grossly degrading.
"Times have changed. Racist fiction should be buried in the past."
Tinashe said that after he complained, a pupil reading the book out in class was told to apologise to him after a character in the novel used racist language.
The teenager, who is studying eight GCSEs and some advanced exams, recently started attending lessons following a 10-day walkout.
His class have finished To Kill A Mocking Bird, but he will still have to study it for his GCSE exam.
Tinashe has been at the school for four years and until this incident had a good record. Last Friday he was excluded following unconnected allegations that he disobeyed his teacher. He refutes the accusation.
Tinashe's family are backing him. Mum Thelma said: "He asked the English teacher to say that the terms used were not right. The teacher asked if he would like to use another word such as black.
"It was not necessary to put him in that position. I said to the headteacher that it wouldn't make any difference because in literature you have to quote the words as they are and therefore if you change it, it is pointless.
"Such books should be banned. This has affected his grades because he was getting A stars and his grades have now gone down to C and D because of pressure."
Headteacher Susan Casey said her staff had approached the subject sensitively and any incidents of racism in the school had been dealt with severely.
She said: "While the student was not able to have a choice of which two books he studied because this decision was teacher-led, we did inform the student ahead of him reading To Kill A Mocking Bird of its prejudicial nature and that it did contain a racially-offensive word.
"Both texts allow teachers to address issues of prejudice so our students can gain a better understanding of its historical context. If the student felt uncomfortable at any time he had the option to approach me or his English teacher so we could discuss it.
"We are extremely concerned about the student's education as he has not attended lessons since scenes from To Kill A Mocking Bird were staged in school by an outside theatre company.
"We have a duty to provide education to our young people, but we do have a clear attendance policy and we are concerned by the student's absence as he is at a pivotal point in his GCSE education."
* PUBLISHED in 1960, To Kill A Mockingbird examines racial prejudice in America. It tells the story of Tom Robinson, a black man wrongly accused of rape, and Atticus Finch, the lawyer who defends him.The Pulitzer Prize-winning book has never been out of print. Author Harper Lee based the novel on true stories from her youth. It was made into a film in 1962, starring Gregory Peck as Finch, which won three Oscars.
"...it is the weak who are cruel, and...gentleness is only to be expected from the strong." - Leo Reston
"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster
"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster