Clips from Oscar Ceremonies at Youtube

Uri
Adjunct
Posts: 1230
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Israel

Post by Uri »

flipp525 wrote:Why did Angela Lansbury accept the award if Ashcroft had specifically asked Banjerlee to do it?
I think it was a case of let’s get the professional Brit everybody knows and like onstage instead of that Indian nobody.
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19339
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Ashcroft was an exception.
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 6166
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Post by flipp525 »

Uri wrote:Well, at least as late as 1985, they kept the habit of other people accepting for absent winners. There was a mini scandal that year when Angela Lansbury picked Peggy Ashcroft’s Oscar instead of co-star Victor Banjeree, who was the one Ashcroft asked to do so when she had to go back to England to attend Michael Redgrave’s funeral.
I thought Peggy Ashcroft was absolutely transcendent in A Passage to India. God, what a well-deserved win that year.

Why did Angela Lansbury accept the award if Ashcroft had specifically asked Banjerlee to do it?
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
Uri
Adjunct
Posts: 1230
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Israel

Post by Uri »

Big Magilla wrote:The practice stopped after Brando ruined it for everyone by having Sasheen Littlefeather refuse the 1972 best actor Oscar on his behalf.

Well, at least as late as 1985, they kept the habit of other people accepting for absent winners. There was a mini scandal that year when Angela Lansbury picked Peggy Ashcroft’s Oscar instead of co-star Victor Banjeree, who was the one Ashcroft asked to do so when she had to go back to England to attend Michael Redgrave’s funeral.
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19339
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Class and no class:

Ruth Gordon:

"I can't tell you how encouraging a thing like this is. I remember the first film I was ever in, in 1915, and here we are in 1969 and I don't know why it took so long, though I don't think I'm backward. Thank all of you who voted for me. And to all who didn't, please excuse me."

Barbra Streisand:

"I was thinking...um...the first script of Funny Girl was written when I was only 11 years old, and, um, thank God it took so long to get it right, you know?"
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19339
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

The practice stopped after Brando ruined it for everyone by having Sasheen Littlefeather refuse the 1972 best actor Oscar on his behalf.
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6385
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

Whatever happened to the practice of a representative accepting the award for people who are not present? When did that stop? The only time nowadays for someone else to go to the podium to speak on behalf of the winner is if the win was posthumous. (Conrad L. Hall and Raul Julia come to mind).

Oh btw, Damien: Do you buy the notion that Streisand would not have won had she not campaigned hard to be in the Academy during the time of the awards?
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19339
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

It's funny, but at the time Woodward was my pick for best actress, mainly because I had already given Hepburn my award four times before. I've since come to like Hepburn's performance a bit more, Woodward's a bit less.

When Bergman announced a tie and said Hepburn's name I hoped Woodward or Neal would be the other one. Even then I didn't like Streisand, who was the popular favorite. While I've always liked Redgrave, I hadn't seen Isadora at the time as it had only been shown in a pre-Oscar qualifying run in L.A. I thought that rather sneaky and unfair to Farrow.

Isadora was released a month or so after the Oscars in truncated form as The Loves of Isadora. I didn't see it until many years later and have never particularly cared for it.

As for the applause, that may have been because Striesand, who was in the audience, was the expected winner. I'm pretty sure both names were applauded about equally when announced as co-winners.




Edited By Big Magilla on 1173077681
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Ironically, the two winning performances are probably the least deserving among the five. (The non-nominated Mia Farrow in Rosemary's Baby was more impressive.) And Vanessa Redgrave is in a class by herself -- one of the greatest performances ever.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 6166
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Post by flipp525 »

OscarGuy wrote:I couldn't tell as the clip is blurry and I haven't seen any of those films.

What?! You haven't seen Isadora, Rachel, Rachel, The Subject Was Roses, Funny Girl or The Lion in Winter? Woodward's performance in Rachel, Rachel is great (as is Estelle Parsons' Oscar-nominated supporting turn) and I'd say that Hepburn's Eleanor of Acquitaine is probably one of her best performances and certainly one of my favorites alongside hers' in Long Day's Journey Into Night. The problem with the first three films in that lineup is that none of them are readily available on DVD.




Edited By flipp525 on 1173059152
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6385
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

Damien wrote:Also, I liked that Ingrid announced the two winners at the same time. Seems as if when there's tie now (whether it's at the Oscars, the Globes or wherever), the presenter waits unril the first recipient finished speaking to bring up the other winner. Seems very cruel to the other nominees.
At the Globes and the Emmys they do that.

The last time the Oscars had a tie was Best Live Action Short in 1995. Tim Allen was presenting and he announced the two winners at the same time. The winners all came up at the same time and took turns making their acceptance speeches.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

They just want to keep the suspense alive.

Now, from the applause in the clip, it didn't seem like Hepburn had that many supporters in the audience...who got the second most applause after Streisand? She read the names in an order other than what was presented, so I couldn't tell as the clip is blurry and I haven't seen any of those films.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Did y'all notice how many empty seats there were? Looked weird -- no wonder they started having seat fillers.


Also, I liked that Ingrid announced the two winners at the same time. Seems as if when there's tie now (whether it's at the Oscars, the Globes or wherever), the presenter waits unril the first recipient finished speaking to bring up the other winner. Seems very cruel to the other nominees.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19339
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Yes, the audience was with her in 1968. Stil, the best speech of the evening, as I recall, was Ruth Gordon's, so thankful to have won an Oscar on her fifth nomination (three having been for writing).
HarryGoldfarb
Adjunct
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 4:50 pm
Location: Colombia
Contact:

Post by HarryGoldfarb »

All the same it was quite interesting, thanks Penelope!

Magilla, however, it seems from the applauses and the laughs that hers was one of the funniest acceptance speeches ever..., the public's reaction to her name was extremely enthusiastic...
"If you place an object in a museum, does that make this object a piece of art?" - The Square (2017)
Post Reply

Return to “Other Oscar Discussions”