Microsoft-Yahoo

[Zahveed]

What else do you expect from a monopolizing behemoth?

[OscarGuy]

This entire dispute sickens me. I don't care much for Microsoft as a company and this just makes it worse. Who didn't think Microsoft would stoop to such tactics to get what it wanted. It's rather pathetic and only underlines how corrupt corporate America is.



Google-Yahoo tie-up draws fire on Capitol Hill 25 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A proposed online advertising deal between Google and Yahoo drew fire from Microsoft and others at a Senate hearing Tuesday even as both companies defended the alliance as positive for consumers and businesses.

Microsoft senior vice president and general counsel Brad Smith delivered a scathing assessment of the tie-up, saying it would crimp competition and give Google "unprecedented" control of the gateway to the Internet.

"If search is the gateway to the Internet, and most believe that it is, this deal will put Google in a position to own that gateway and the information that flows through it," Smith told the Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee hearing.

"Never before in the history of advertising has one company been in the position to control prices on up to 90 percent of advertising in a single medium. Not in television, not in radio, not in publishing. It should not happen on the Internet."

David Drummond, Google's chief legal officer, argued that "the online advertising marketplace is competitive, robust and dynamic" and that the tie-up would be beneficial to Internet users and advertisers.

"This arrangement is not a merger, nor a joint venture," he said.

"Why did Google enter into this agreement? We think we'll make money of course, and we think we'll do so by giving millions of consumers, publishers, and advertisers access to more relevant online ads. Where Google's system may provide better results, Yahoo will be able to use it to complement its own advertising program. The whole system becomes more efficient."

Yahoo general counsel Michael Callahan said he wanted to dispel "quite a few misconceptions" about the plan.

"This is not a merger. Far from it -- we will increasingly compete with Google, and they with us. This is a commercial arrangement between two companies who will remain autonomous and compete aggressively -- in search and display advertising, mobile, news, e-mail, finance -- you name it."

Callahan added that "the claim some have made that Yahoo and Google are price-fixing is entirely false. Prices for search terms are set by open and fair market-based auctions, and advertisers only pay when consumers click on their ads."

The hearing was called after Yahoo spurned a takeover by Microsoft and rushed into Google's arms in the hope an alliance will improve its sagging fortunes.

The Yahoo-Google deal would put the Internet search king's expertise to work pumping money from advertising posted next to Yahoo Internet search results.

Google technology would be used to better target ads posted on a portion of Yahoo search pages.

Subcommittee chair Senator Herb Kohl pledged close scrutiny of the deal.

"In examining the competitive impact of this deal, we will need to find answers to a number of important questions," Kohl said at the hearing.

"What will be the effect of Yahoo outsourcing a portion of its search advertising to its biggest competitor? Will it lead to higher advertising rates? Or will it work to advertisers' benefit by giving them a bigger audience?"

Senator Patrick Leahy expressed concern about the deal giving Google access to private user data.

"The ability of a single company to dominate the online advertising marketplace also raises the specter that one company will accumulate vast amounts of personal viewing data," he said.

"That worries me as much as any one item."