“We also devised a way to have more control over the interocular distance — on Avatar, some shots were down to 1/3-inch interocular, and others were all the way out to 2 inches,” Pace adds. “With all of those elements combined, you’ve got an intense 3-D system.”anonymous wrote:An interesting article on the cinematography of Avatar.
I'd recommend people who think its nomination is "ridiculous" to read it.
??? ??? ???
There was nothing in the article which changed my opinion of the artistic accomplishment of the cinematography of AVATAR. However, I am more impressed with its technical achievements. If only there were some night to celebrate all the major technical achievements of filmmakers from 2009.
Oh, wait, there is.