Evaluating the nominees

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 15704
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Postby Big Magilla » Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:04 am

dylanfan23 wrote:Actress
1. Mirren
2. Streep
3. Mulligan
4. Sidibe
5. Bullock

Nice to see to see somebody else appreciates Mirren.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” - Voltaire

dylanfan23
Temp
Posts: 475
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:46 pm
Location: Belleville, NJ
Contact:

Postby dylanfan23 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:33 am

I'll rank the nominees i've seen.

Picture
1. Up in the Air
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. Hurt Locker
4. Precious
5. An Education
6. Up
7. A Serious Man
8. District 9
9. Avatar
10. Blind Side
I liked them all except the last two...i thought the top five should have been nominated. I liked both up in the air and inglorious basterds a lot more than the other three though. So i guess i'll be rooting for a basterds upset because somewhere along the line up in the air stopped being a real contender, not sure why. But if if locker wins i won't be unhappy at all, it was a great film. If avatar wins i'll be about as unhappy as i was when i heard blind side nomination morning.

Director
1. Tarentino
2. Reitman
3. Bigelow
4. Daniels
5. Cameron
All good jobs, i wouldn't have nominate daniels or cameron though. And either of the my top three would be fine with me, they are very close in my mind.

Actor
1. Clooney
2. Bridges
3. Firth
4. Freeman
5. Renner
I thought all these were great espesially the first 3. They are very close, actually the best performances by each actor in my mind and i've enjoyed all three. I would have probably not nominated the last two but that would be close. Won't be unhappy at all if bridges wins..if renner pulls off an upset that would be upsetting because of how good the first three performances are for me.

Actress
1. Mirren
2. Streep
3. Mulligan
4. Sidibe
5. Bullock
Bullock was the best part of the blind side but there are still 15 or 20 better lead performances this year by women. So it would be very dissappointing if she wins anything else. Its a coin toss for me between my top 2. I probably am so high on mirren because i went into the film thinking i wouldn't like the performances all that much and i ended up being behind them. But with the queen being so recent helen has no chance, so i'm rooting for streep or a mulligan upset big time...actually any name besides sandras would be fine by me...i wouldn't have nominated gaby, but she was my next one.

Supporting Actor
1. Waltz
2. Plummer
3. Damon
Have not seen harrleson or tucci
I can't wait to see the messenger but it was out for sure a short period of time in jersey and i haven't made it into the city as much as i usually do this time of year. And i'm waiting for dvd for lovely bones. Right now i would nominate tucci from julie and julia though. I would have nominated both plummer and waltz, but even though i liked invictus a lot more than most i would not have nominated damon. Waltz is the clear winner for me.

Supporting Actress
1. Kendrick
2. Monique
3. Farmiga
4. Gyllenhaal
5. Cruz
I think the first four were all great and was not unhappy with the nominations, this was a little bit of a weak year for this catorgory but the first 3 are all top notch for me. I thought kendrick was perfect and as good as monique was i would have voted for kendrick...but i won't be complaining when monique gets it.

Adapted Screenplay
1. Up in the Air
2. An Education
3. Precious
4. District 9
I'll be watching in the loop tomorrow.
I'll be dissappointed if up in the air doesn't win...great adaptation...actually all four that i've seen were very good..the bottom three could be switched easily.

Original Screenplay
1. Inglourious Basterds
2. Hurt Locker
3. A Serious Man
4. Up
Have not seen the messenger.
I still can't believe 500 days isn't here...so sad. But out of these nominees basterds is far better for me. I liked them all but this is one award i would really be dissappointed if hurt locker wins.

Foreign Language
I've only seen the white ribbon and i liked it but didn't think it was great...beautiful though and at times very good...but could have been a lot better i think.

Cinematography
1. Inglourious Basterds
2. White Ribbon
3. Hurt Locker
4. Harry Potter
5. Avatar
All shot very well...i don't want to see avatar win this. I thought the top three were probably the best three i've seen this year so won't unhappy wiht a locker win.

Visual Effects
1. Avatar
2. District 9
Have not seen star trek
Two deserving nominees and avatar deserves this one.

Sound Mixing
1. Avatar
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. Hurt Locker
4. Transformers
Have not seen Star Trek
I thought the sound in avatar was very well done, would have nominated my first 3.

Sound Editing
1. Avatar
2. Hurt Locker
3. Inglourious Basterds
4. Up
Have not seen Star Trek
I would have nominated all four i'd seen...all great, would not be unhappy with either one.

Make Up
1. II Divo
2. Young Victoria
Have not seen Star Trek
I guess i'd prefer II Divo...not partial.

Film Editing
1. Hurt Locker
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. District 9
4. Precious
5. Avatar
Very dissappointed neither up in the air or 500 days was nominated. Hurt Locker was the best of the year though and by far the best choice for me.

Original Song
1. Weary Kind
2. Down in New Orleans
3. Almost There
4. Loin de Paname
5. Take it All

Original Score
1. Up
2. Sherlock Holmes
3. Fantastic Mr. Fox
4. Avatar
5. Hurt Locker

Costume
1. Bright Star
2. Nine
3. Coco Before Chanel
4. Young Victoria
Still don't get why their gonna give young victoria this award over 3 that were better...haven't seen doctor parnassus yet.

Animated
1. Up
2. Fantastic Mr. Fox
3. Coroline
4. Secret of Kells
5. Princess and the Frog
I usually don't get behind animated films but i actually enjoyed all 5 of these...i just saw secret of kells today and was a little dissappointed with it...but the top three i enjoyed very much.

Art Direction
1. Sherlock Holmes
2. Nine
3. Avatar
4. Young Victoria

Uri
Adjunct
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:37 pm
Location: Israel

Postby Uri » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:52 am

This year I'm going to be quite ill equipped come Oscar night. The Blind Side, Crazy Heart, The Last Station, The Messenger and District 9 haven't opened here yet. The Hurt Locker wasn't supposed to be shown here in theaters - although now, due to its predicted Oscar glory it probably will – but I asked my sister to bring me the DVD from the States, and I did see it yesterday, so with the fact that I was hugely lucky to be able to see The Lovely Bones the day before, it's time for my annual list.

My rating: A- the ultimate best of the year, B- very good, would make a decent, worthy winner, C- a nomination should suffice, D- not necessarily bad, but not award material, F- a failure.


Best Picture
1. En Education – C. A lovely, smart with quite a few sly social, historical and cultural (minor) remarks. Not a major work by any mean, but the most successfully executed piece of work of the nominees.
2. Up in the Air – C. I really enjoyed this one, and I found the fact that it somehow lost its way as it went along rather endearing and in a way fitting with the story. Extra point for the fact that I actually sat their laughing from time to time – not that common for me these days.
3. A Serious Man – C. An intellectual home movie. A relaxed, entertaining, sharply observant at times, pissing on conventional expectations - which is great – but it is an obscure and quirky inner joke – one I was happy to share, but for all its merit as a sincere and poignant meditation, it's not a fully worked out film (intentionally).
4. The Hurt Locker – D. I can see why Israeli distributors passed on it when they first saw it. Here we have our annual war-is-bad entries which are as good if not better, and just like Beaufort, Waltz with Bashir or Lebanon, this one too is avoiding any attempt at trying to figure out the bigger picture, self congratulatoringlly(?) dwelling in the damage war has on our poor boys. And while it is definitely well made, I didn't really believe the (rather cliché) situations or buy the attitude of these characters. And for those who find this such a grand film – was this the first war movie you ever saw?
5. Inglorious Basterds – D. I was totally antagonized by this one. My fault.
6. Precious – D. This one is not a cinematic entity, it's a catalogue of issues. And as such it strives to be as complete as possible. I saw it with my niece, who's much more sensitive and compassionate than I, and even she said they lost her with the AIDS stuff. And I was reminded of my favorite movie of all times – The Color Purple – when it turns out that for black women to be happy all they need is to be able to live in a men free Lesbian fantasy.
7. Avatar – F. A brainless, aggressive theme park ride.

I happened to miss Up. Not the end of the world, I guess.

Should've been: They could go with Invictus, A Single Man and then what? Dreadful year indeed.

Best Director
1. Jason Reitman – C. A pleasant surprise – I haven't seen Thank You for Smoking and I loathed Juno, but this one is nicely enough navigated.
2. Quantin Tarantino – D. So the man can make movies. Let him go back to his usual frivolous stuff and I'll be happy to embrace him again.
3. Kathryn Bigelow– D. So she has balls. Great. If this must be the year for the first woman to be crowned best director (directress?), they could go with Lone Schering.
4. Lee Daniels – F. For all its limitations, Precious could have been made into a much more acceptable piece in the hands of a more capable film maker.
5. James Cameron – F. I don't want to have anything to do with this man, on or off screen.

Should've been: Tom Ford for best director? The stretches one must succumb to this year.

Best Actor
1. Colin Firth– A. I've never been a fan – his Darcy is a minor travesty – and I don't like to use the term "a revelation", but he is great here.
2. George Cloony – B. I've always been a fan, and he is rather perfect here.
3. Morgan Freeman – C. I've said elsewhere Invictus is not about its components being exceptionally flashy or overwhelmingly outstanding. This is a serviceable performance, and this time I use the term as a very high praise. A very wise performance.
4. Jeremy Renner –C. I was not impressed with his film nor did I found the character he played a very believable one, but he did a very creditable job in these circumstances. I'd like to see him in better parts.

Should've been: first, let me say I'll be overjoyed this coming Sunday(actually Monday here) when Bridges walks away with the Oscar, even if this one was for Against all Odds or King Kong. And this is a rather solid list. I guess I'd replace Renner with Matt Damon once I have the chance to see The Informant.

Best Actress
1. Carey Mulligan – B. Smart, sly and deceptively complex characterizing.
2. Meryl Streep – B. So it's not Medea nor Lady Macbeth. A captivatingly joyous turn.
3. Gaboury Sidibe – D. Between the harrowing elements of the character she portrays and the shear poignancy and sensation in the fact a person of her attributes is allowed to have center stage in a motion picture, what we are left with is nice natural presence, one which should have been used for a better movie.

Should've been: If ever there was a "should've been" it's Tilda Swinton.

Best Supporting Actor
1. Matt Damon –C. A serviceable turn by an actor I'm a big fan of. And it's not a category fraud!
2. Christoph Waltz – D. A tedious, hard labored attempt at being both menace and funny.
3. Stanley Tucci – D. So before the film was made, the character and the casting suggested a shoe in nomination. How lazy could academy members get? A (bland) nothing of a performance in a (dreadful) nothing of a film.

Should've been: The guys from En Education, especially Sarsgaard. And there seem to be plenty of good ones in the films I haven't seen yet.

Best Supporting Actress
1. Vera Farmiga – B. A fine turn - mature, intelligent, sensual and non sentimental.
2. Anna Kendrick – C. Nicely if not sensationally performing a nicely if not sensationally written role.
3. Mo'Nueiq– D. Wow, guilt and sensationalism can get you a long way, can't they? The shock value is certainly there, and to her credit she doesn’t over sell it, and as is the case with Sidibe, I guess she would have been better had the material been better.
4. Penelope Cruz – F. Last year I called her turn in VCB a noisy cliché and gave it a D. This year she gives the same performance AND clumsily sings and dance, hence the F.

Should've been: Julianne Moore, Rosamund Pike.




Edited By Uri on 1267866210


Return to “82nd Nominations and Winners”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest