Worst Supporting Actor Winner of the Decade

Post Reply

Worst Supporting Actor Winner of the Decade

Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds
1
2%
Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight
1
2%
Javier Bardem, No Country for Old Men
2
5%
Alan Arkin, Little Miss Sunshine
17
40%
George Clooney, Syriana
11
26%
Morgan Freeman, Million Dollar Baby
1
2%
Tim Robbins, Mystic River
1
2%
Chris Cooper, Adaptation.
0
No votes
Jim Broadbent, Iris
6
14%
Benicio Del Toro, Traffic
2
5%
 
Total votes: 42

Hustler
Tenured
Posts: 2914
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires-Argentina

Post by Hustler »

Broadbent
Reza
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10055
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 11:14 am
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan

Post by Reza »

Clooney.........not because it was a bad performance. It was good, but hardly worth an Oscar. And it wasn't as if at that stage he was due one for his career. Strange choice.
barrybrooks8
Temp
Posts: 463
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Post by barrybrooks8 »

Clooney, then Arkin, then Robbins.
"Jesus! Look at my hands! Now really, I am too young for liver spots. Maybe I can merge them together into a tan."
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3794
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Post by dws1982 »

Almost went with Bardem because (while I do love the movie) he was just serviceable and beat some truly excellent performances--Affleck and especially Holbrook. But in other threads I've had to bite my tongue when someone voted a performance I love as the worst just because of who it beat. So I don't really go in for that.

So in the end, even though no one was really screwed, I had to go with Broadbent's audition for the lead in The Absent-Minded Professor.




Edited By dws1982 on 1268920257
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

I have to go with Bardem, one of the most ridiculously overpraised performances I can remember. Sandra Bullock gets flack for being "flat" in The Blind Side, but how is Bardem not "flat" in No Country for Old Men? He just walks around with a bland-menacing look and spouts monotonous words at people. There's no meaning or inflection, it's just mediocre. Will never understand the love of this performance.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Waltz, Bardem, Robbins, Broadbent, Del Toro -- 5 utterly mediocre performances

Arkin -- 1 utterly terrible performance
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 4312
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Post by The Original BJ »

Clearly Alan Arkin, though he makes a lot more sense as an Oscar-winner career wise than anyone nominated alongside him.
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19336
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Broadbent.
Mister Tee
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8648
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by Mister Tee »

Got to be Arkin for me, not so much for the performance (and certainly not for the actor), but for the film, which I continue to dislike. But the vehemence with which I dislike him doesn't even approach what I feel for Crowe and Bullock, my choices in the other negative threads. (And god help us when we get to supporting actress)
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10757
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

Number of performances I think are truly, no-bones-about-it supporting: Arkin, Freeman, and Cooper. I think that the performances that should win this award are truly supporting and performances like Ledger, Bardem, and Broadbent are clearly co-leads. This year just had a better crop of co-leads than usual. As the years go on, we're clearly getting more and more co-leads pushed to support where they win, which is a shame.

I need to see Mystic River again. The last time I saw it, I didn't like it nearly as much and found Robbin's perf to be annoyingly one-noted. Especially after seeing him do the same thing in the otherwise superior War of the Worlds, he might be my choice. That being said, while Alan Arkin certainly livens up Little Miss Sunshine with a certain charm, it's a wholly unambitious performance in a somehow less ambitious film. He's undercut by his character's (*COUGH*) trajectory and that his character's legacy is that dance off at the end which is completely annoying, I have no problem choosing Arkin.
"How's the despair?"
Post Reply

Return to “81st and Other 9th Decade Discussions”