National Board of Review

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19337
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Poor Leo. He should have won for Gilbert Grape when he wasn't so "pretty". Who knows if he'll even be around when he's old and wrinkled.
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6384
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

Leo will probably win his first Oscar on his 7th or 8th nomination and when he's well over 40 or 50 (or older). The Academy generally doesn't like to give pretty boy movie stars their Oscars until they've got wrinkles.
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10758
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

There's always Leonardo DiCaprio. This will be his fourth nomination, but could just as easily be his sixth.
"How's the despair?"
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6384
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

Clint Eastwod may already have 4 Oscars but none of them are for Best Actor.
FilmFan720
Emeritus
Posts: 3650
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: Illinois

Post by FilmFan720 »

I don't think his recent win is too much of a deterrent for Penn. First off, he is showing a different side to him. Second, he is a beloved actor whom most in Hollywood would not begrudge a second Oscar. Plus, he won 5 years ago, which is a longer time span than say Kevin Spacey had before his second Oscar. Add in that he is in a Best Picture frontrunner (possibly...ala Spacey) and you have a good shot at an Oscar here.
"Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good."
- Minor Myers, Jr.
jack
Assistant
Posts: 897
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 4:39 pm
Location: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia

Post by jack »

Sabin wrote:Mickey Rourke showed up to an interview and apparently started rattling off the word "faggot" like a comma, talking about some "fag writer" who hit on him at a bar.
Yeah, Rourke's a nutcase. Always will be.

I still think he'll win, though. Penn just won. Eastwood has four. It's between Rourke and Langella. Though maybe Jenkins could take it.

There you have it. A good Best Actor list:

Clint Eastwood - Grand Torino
Richard Jenkins - The Visitor
Frank Langella - Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn - Milk
Micky Rourke - The Wrestler
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10758
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

Mickey Rourke showed up to an interview and apparently started rattling off the word "faggot" like a comma, talking about some "fag writer" who hit on him at a bar.
"How's the despair?"
jack
Assistant
Posts: 897
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 4:39 pm
Location: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia

Post by jack »

Eastwood has four Oscars. I think the Academy could resist the temptation.

I'll throw in my two cents and say that Micky Rourke will win Best Actor at the Oscars.
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10758
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

After watching 'Milk', I have to say that Sean Penn gives the kind of performance that seems like a very good bet for an Oscar regardless of previous victories. Clint Eastwood has a much better chance now. I don't think Mickey Rourke really CAN win an Oscar but this will be Sean Penn's fifth Oscar. He's a beloved actor, if not personality. 'Into the Wild' didn't really go over last year but there was a lot of good will aimed towards him. He may not be as beloved as Clint Eastwood but there is so much joy in Penn's performance.
"How's the despair?"
dylanfan23
Temp
Posts: 475
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:46 pm
Location: Belleville, NJ

Post by dylanfan23 »

I'm not saying this this award means anything. I've always thought the national board means about as much as the satalite nominations in the whole sceme of things. But just as the others do, they get you to start thinking.

And i'm thinking if clint can come up with a nomination, i think he comes out of it with a win.

Now i haven't seen the film and i haven't seen penn, pitt, langella, dicaprio or rourke but i'm thinking it might be very hard for them to resist awarding clint espesially if its the type of performance people will totally fall for. And from the early reviews it seems like people do fall for it if they can stand the movie.

So with that and the fact penn has won already and the wrestler might be too much and they might look at the nomination as their way of saying good comeback.

I can see a lot of awards going to penn and rourke and the oscar going to clint...just a thought.
Mister Tee
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8648
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by Mister Tee »

Belatedly, their top 10 indies:

FROZEN RIVER
IN BRUGES
IN SEARCH OF A MIDNIGHT KISS
MR. FOE
RACHEL GETTING MARRIED
SNOW ANGELS
SON OF RAMBOW
WENDY AND LUCY
VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA
THE VISITOR




Edited By Mister Tee on 1228426184
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 6166
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Post by flipp525 »

Penelope wrote:
The Original BJ wrote:This certainly isn't good news for The Reader -- I thought if it were to perform well anywhere, it would be here.

This doesn't surprise me at all: The Reader (at least the book) is NOT a safe, reassuring, feel-good Holocaust film like Schindler's List; it's quite the opposite, and so the middle-brow NBR rejecting it isn't a shocker.
There's definitely no pat-yourself-on-the-back moment in The Reader. It's shocking and deeply unsettling and the character of Hanna is extremely difficult to pigeon-hole (Is she noble? Is she a monster? Is she, well, human at all?)
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
Penelope
Site Admin
Posts: 5663
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Tampa, FL, USA

Post by Penelope »

The Original BJ wrote:This certainly isn't good news for The Reader -- I thought if it were to perform well anywhere, it would be here.
This doesn't surprise me at all: The Reader (at least the book) is NOT a safe, reassuring, feel-good Holocaust film like Schindler's List; it's quite the opposite, and so the middle-brow NBR rejecting it isn't a shocker.
"...it is the weak who are cruel, and...gentleness is only to be expected from the strong." - Leo Reston

"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster
rain Bard
Associate
Posts: 1611
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 6:55 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by rain Bard »

OscarGuy wrote:Matter of fact, Foreign Film and Documentary are not listed in their respective lists either...wth is up with these people?
At least in the documentary case, the "top five" list is cited as specifically American, and the winner Man on Wire is a British/French production.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

Let's also look at their Best Picture prognostication ability.

In the last 5 years, No Country for Old Men was the only film to carry through to an Oscar victory.

In the last 10 years, add American Beauty to that list.

In the last 20 years, you can add Forrest Gump, Schindler's List, Silence of the Lambs, Dances With Wolves and Driving Miss Daisy to the list. I don't think Slumdog's win here is a preface to anything yet.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply

Return to “81st and Other 9th Decade Discussions”