Cannes Round-Up

Post Reply
Penelope
Site Admin
Posts: 5663
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Tampa, FL, USA

Post by Penelope »

"Waltz With Bashir" sounds like a terrific movie; From the NY Times:

Shaking Up the Crowd at Cannes
By MANOHLA DARGIS
CANNES, France — The apocalypse came early to the Cannes Film Festival this year, filling screening rooms with snarling dogs, bursting bombs, shouting men and screaming women. Midway through Day 2, on Thursday, characters had gone blind, gone to prison, gone to war. One had turned into a piece of furniture, and another had crawled out of a sewer, slimed in waste that the filmmaker threw at the audience with giggles, metaphorically speaking, of course.

Cannes has a tradition of shaking audiences up, sometimes all the way out the nearest exit. Last year on Day 1, the festival unveiled “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days,” the Romanian film about illegal abortion during the Ceausescu era, which took home the Palme d’Or. This year that same competition slot was occupied by another powerhouse film, “Waltz With Bashir,” an animated documentary from Israel about the 1982 massacre at the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon. Written and directed by Ari Folman, who has made some half-dozen live-action documentaries, and animated by the Bridgit Folman Film Gang, the movie is a soldiers’ story by one of their own: the haunted young man at its center is Mr. Folman himself.

He plunges us right into his nightmare with a harrowing vision of low-down and dark dogs running at the camera, teeth bared and eyes glowing bilious orange-yellow. The dogs run and they run, gathering in number as they cut a swath through everything and everyone — men, women, children — in their path.

People scatter like pebbles, and a ribbon of slobber lashes the camera lens. Finally, the dogs stop under a window where a man several stories up from the street warily looks down at the snapping, barking, growling menace below. Cut to a bar, where a man, Ari (Mr. Folman), asks his friend Boaz, the man who has dreamed himself into that phantasmagoric scene, what happens next. “I wake up,” Boaz says.

Like Boaz, who is haunted by the war in Lebanon (or rather his absence of its memories), Ari is plagued by a past he can’t recall. And so he sets out to uncover history, to sift through the memories of other Israeli soldiers — all but two of the nine testimonials are firsthand accounts — and to make sense of the one image he does retain, that of three young soldiers rising naked out of the sea and somnolently drifting into the Beirut battlefield. As in “Maus,” Art Spiegelman’s two-volume graphic novel about the Holocaust, the animation in “Waltz With Bashir” initially works as something of a distancing device, giving you the space — intellectual, emotional — to process the story and its accumulating horrors.

Mr. Folman isn’t a revisionist: he points fingers at the followers of Bashir Gemayel, the charismatic Christian militia leader and Lebanon’s president-elect whose assassination preceded the mass murder at the camps, and saves hard words for Ariel Sharon, then the Israeli defense minister. Mr. Folman also doesn’t blink when it comes to what young soldiers do in wartime: at the sniper who lethally picks a man off a donkey, at the tank that crushes flowers and then cars under its wheels, taking down men drinking coffee and buildings alike. First pop songs fill the air and then yellow flares.

Brought to vital, plausible life in a combination of Flash, classic and 3-D animation, the characters look as if they stepped right out of a graphic novel. Their faces and bodies, for instance, are outlined in black, but their faces are so ductile and expressive that I was surprised that they hadn’t been rotoscoped (the animation technique in which live-action movement is traced over). The fluidity of the figures accentuates the air of surreality — one soldier compares war to an acid trip — which deepens as the story reaches its terrible end. That finale, which finds the animation violently giving way to live-action documentary footage, is stunning, at once a furious act of conscience and a lament.

“Waltz With Bashir,” which as of Thursday afternoon did not have American distribution, was a welcome tonic, given the cloying aftertaste left by the festival’s opening selection. Bad openers are another Cannes tradition, so it wasn’t much of a surprise that “Blindness” is such a misfire. The film, which heads to American theaters later this year (via Miramax), was directed by Fernando Meirelles, who shook up screens in 2002 with “City of God,” an art-house exploitation film with lots of bullets and not enough brains, and then went higher-brow with an adaptation of John le Carré’s “Constant Gardener.” Based on a novel by the Nobel laureate José Saramago, this new film goes higher up the brow still, with an allegory with a very large capital A.

Nasty, brutish and nowhere near short enough, “Blindness” tracks the utopian ups and dreadful downs of various people — a strong Mark Ruffalo is the Doctor, and a nearly as good Julianne Moore plays the Doctor’s Wife — who are interned after a national outbreak of contagious blindness. One bad thing leads to another (it’s a Hobbesian world after all), including mass rape, exceptional production design (Toronto looks a mess) and a lot of acting from Danny Glover (the Man with the Black Eye Patch), Gael García Bernal (the King) and Maury Chaykin (the Accountant). Curiously, the film’s carefully calibrated racial and ethnic demographics echo those of the central castaways in “Lost,” though any given episode in that show’s best seasons is far better. Smarter too.

A maximalist who never made a shot he didn’t seem to want to tweak, Mr. Meirelles, with his heavy hand, is a poor fit for a story already heavily burdened by an allegory that’s at once obvious (we’re blind!) and elusive (because of ...?). It isn’t enough that people turn blind here without rhyme or reason, or that the blind are soon leading the blind with no end in sight, both literally and figuratively. Mr. Meirelles also has to flood the screen with a sizzling (blinding) white, which causes your pupils to constrict. That’s a cool enough trick the first five or six times, but it grows wearisome when you realize that Mr. Meirelles is capable only of bopping the audience on the head, not engaging what’s inside those heads.

Far superior is the metaphorically inclined short “Shaking Tokyo,” a story about a shut-in from Bong Joon-ho, last in Cannes in 2006 with “The Host.” Mr. Bong’s short is the final chapter in the triptych “Tokyo!,” which, as you might expect, mostly takes place in that city. The first, “Interior Design,” is a bit of predictable whimsy from Michel Gondry and involves a wallflower who metamorphoses into a chair; the second short, named for a French vulgarity, finds its director, Leos Carax, in an absurdist mood and throwing scat all over the screen. Too bad that the tough female prisoners in the Argentine drama “Leonera” weren’t around to reply in kind.
"...it is the weak who are cruel, and...gentleness is only to be expected from the strong." - Leo Reston

"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster
Post Reply

Return to “2008”