I have not seen the film yet but I had a similar reaction to the book. Important developments, things I was looking forward to experiencing, took place "off camera", for lack of a better way to express it. During the long passages in italics, which are largely Bell's (Tommy Lee Jones' character) ruminations on life, we find out about a lot of important plot developments and changes in the lives of important characters. We find out about these developments as things that have already happened. This annoyed me, although many readers liked the unconventional storytelling.flipp525 wrote:Sonic Youth wrote:Without spoiling anything (I'm not seeing it until Thanksgiving), is the ending going to be a real turnoff to many?
It wasn't a turnoff so much as it was an abruptly unsatisfying conclusion to what had been, up until that point, a brilliant film. To me, it just felt like the movie suddenly dropped off. Without giving too much away, it's preceded by one scene (that caused me to avert my eyes -- you'll see why) which had a haunting sense of closure for one character and then another scene that, upon reflection, seemed to act as a "final summation of themes". The last scene seems to make good on that penultimate scene between Ed Tom Bell and his uncle and does make a certain amount of sense. It just felt anti-climactic and abrupt.
When the screen went to black, one girl in the theater went, "What? That's it?" to the silent theater and then, everyone around me sort of agreed. I guess I just wanted one more scene. I don't know. Tomorrow, I might think something completely different about it. That's the sort of film experience it was.
Anyone else have another reaction?
No Country for Old Men: The Poll
The great thing in the world is not so much where we stand, as in what direction we are moving. It's faith in something and enthusiasm for something that makes a life worth living. Oliver Wendell Holmes
-
The Original BJ
- Emeritus
- Posts: 4312
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm
I almost felt like the ending to No Country wasn't abrupt ENOUGH. I thought the third-to-last scene would have made a terrific ending, stark and brutally fatalistic. I thought the second-to-last scene would have also made a fine ending, a shocking and perfectly ironic exclamation mark. As for the last scene, it didn't bother me -- it's hauntingly sad and does sum up a lot of the film's themes -- but nor is it a terrific final moment either. My audience, however, thought otherwise: a vocal majority either groaned or yelled "what?!" as the credits began to roll.
Still, if The Sopranos can win an Emmy for an even more abrupt finale, I say No Country can at least fill the Goodfellas/Pulp Fiction/Fargo/L.A. Confidential Oscar-runner up slot. A win, though, seems unlikely for a film that isn't so easy to cuddle up to.
More later, but I liked it it a lot.
Still, if The Sopranos can win an Emmy for an even more abrupt finale, I say No Country can at least fill the Goodfellas/Pulp Fiction/Fargo/L.A. Confidential Oscar-runner up slot. A win, though, seems unlikely for a film that isn't so easy to cuddle up to.
More later, but I liked it it a lot.
Sonic Youth wrote:Without spoiling anything (I'm not seeing it until Thanksgiving), is the ending going to be a real turnoff to many?
It wasn't a turnoff so much as it was an abrupt, unsatisfying conclusion to what had been, up until that point, a brilliant film. To me, it just felt like the movie suddenly dropped off. Without giving too much away, it's preceded by one scene (that caused me to avert my eyes -- you'll see why) which had a haunting sense of closure for one character and then another scene that, upon reflection, seemed to act as a "final summation of themes". The last scene seems to make good on that penultimate scene between Ed Tom Bell and his uncle and does make a certain amount of sense. It just felt anti-climactic and abrupt.
When the screen went to black, one girl in the theater went, "What? That's it?" to the silent theater and then, everyone around me sort of agreed. I guess I just wanted one more scene. I don't know. Tomorrow, I might think something completely different about it. That's the sort of film experience it was.
Anyone else have another reaction?
Edited By flipp525 on 1194751922
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-
Sonic Youth
- Tenured Laureate
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
- Location: USA
flipp525 wrote:Javier Bardem deserves all the accolades he's already reaped for this role but Josh Brolin was really the standout for me. I just loved his performance. Kelly Macdonald was wonderfully endearing as his wife, Carla Jean. I'm still processing that ending, though. WTF?
See, this is what I think could hurt "No Country"s chances. The ending, whatever it is. More critics seem to appreciate it better than others and accept it on the film's own terms - and it's supposed to be completely faithful to the novel - but I'm getting the feeling audiences aren't going to dig it.
Without spoiling anything (I'm not seeing it until Thanksgiving), is the ending going to be a real turnoff to many?
P.S.: Rotten Tomatoes score now at 95%.
"What the hell?"
Win Butler
Win Butler
-
anonymous1980
- Laureate
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
- Location: Manila
- Contact:
Nick Schager's ***1/2 review in SlantMagazine.com
Javier Bardem deserves all the accolades he's already reaped for this role but Josh Brolin was really the standout for me. I just loved his performance. Kelly Macdonald was wonderfully endearing as his wife, Carla Jean. I'm still processing that ending, though. WTF?
Sabin: 1
OscarGuy: 0
Edited By flipp525 on 1194663573
Sabin: 1
OscarGuy: 0
Edited By flipp525 on 1194663573
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
-
FilmFan720
- Emeritus
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
- Location: Illinois
-
Sonic Youth
- Tenured Laureate
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
- Location: USA
-
Johnny Guitar
- Assistant
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Just so it's clear (re: Magilla & Sonic's comments), I'm not taking sides pro or con the Coens, or pro or con its Oscar chances. I don't really have an opinion on the issue. My link to Rosenbaum's review was simply to indicate one intelligent heavy hitter's opinion. (I'd have posted it if it were four stars, honest.)
-
Big Magilla
- Site Admin
- Posts: 19338
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
- Location: Jersey Shore
No, he isn't, but he spends a good part of his review talking about how popular the film was at Cannes and Toronto, and comparing it to The Silence of the Lambs, another popular film he didn't like, which as he explains, went on to win five Oscars in 1992.Johnny Guitar wrote:Hmm. Well, Jonathan Rosenbaum is not a fan.
-
Sonic Youth
- Tenured Laureate
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
- Location: USA
Anyway, I think it's good that this thread is dominated with negative reviews for the film.
When a movie recieves a 93% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a 94 rating on Metacritic (with twelve perfect-100 scores as of now), it always feels like the contrary opinion is unfairly drowned out. Kudos to all who are trying to keep it... well, keep it equitable, if not real.
When a movie recieves a 93% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a 94 rating on Metacritic (with twelve perfect-100 scores as of now), it always feels like the contrary opinion is unfairly drowned out. Kudos to all who are trying to keep it... well, keep it equitable, if not real.
"What the hell?"
Win Butler
Win Butler