Ebert calls Synecdoche Best of Decade

The Original BJ
Posts: 4312
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: Ebert calls

Postby The Original BJ » Wed May 06, 2015 10:55 am

flipp525 wrote:
Eric wrote:I'm precisely the opposite. There are definitely a dozen or so movies I could live with calling my favorite movie of the decade, but there is only one contender for the slot of the worst. I hardly need to name it here, I trust.

Eric, what film are you talking about here?

"Now you're on your own, in the deeeeeeep..."

User avatar
Posts: 5964
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am


Postby flipp525 » Wed May 06, 2015 9:50 am

Eric wrote:I'm precisely the opposite. There are definitely a dozen or so movies I could live with calling my favorite movie of the decade, but there is only one contender for the slot of the worst. I hardly need to name it here, I trust.

Eric, what film are you talking about here?
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

User avatar
Posts: 5964
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Postby flipp525 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:57 am

I think Synecdoche, New York is, while not a masterpiece and certainly not the best film of the decade, at least a substantial piece of filmmaking that is, perhaps most importantly, personal, a quality that doesn't always lend itself to completely polished works, but does feel more genuine. Resurrecting a bit of old thoughts on the film, but...

I think there are a lot of interesting themes running through it and, even more importantly, some great performances. Philip Seymour Hoffman fits into the role of Caden like a glove and I think it might be some of Samantha Morton's best work (just saw Control this past weekend and how she wasn't nominated for that alongside Sam Riley is a criminal case to get into in another thread). Catherine Keener phones it in, yet I was rather fascinated by her character's art. Emily Watson succeeds with a difficult role and Dianne Wiest, while nothing revelatory, adds a prestige to her character that made it grand. Even the talented Robin Weigert ("Deadwood") absolutely shined in her one scene. I can't really begrudge a filmmaker who creates that many multi-faceted roles for woman (or was it really one role with each facet being played by a separate actress? Hmmm...)

Past Kaufman exploits felt a bit more accessible to me: Being John Malkovich had a unique premise that never dipped into alienation. The audience cared about the plight of John Cusack's character because who hasn't literally wanted to walk in someone else's shoes for a day before? As much as they were surrounded by such abject quirkiness, the characters seemed real and, therefore, the wacky premise almost seemed plausible.

Adaptation, not Synecdoche, is the apex of Kaufman's screenwriting efforts for me. To swim alongside one's own creative process in such a revealing way, yet, at the same time, to be true to the source material you are supposedly adapting (for I think the essence of what Susan Orlean is doing in The Orchid Thief is very much captured in Adaptation) is a true feat. It was an audacious effort that succeeded from the writing to the directing to the beautiful performances (Streep's best work of the '00's and maybe one of her top performances ever.)

When Synecdoche dipped into the morass of Kaufman's fugue-like malaise, things started dripping off the canvas for me and it was hard to keep a through-line. What makes me keep coming back to this film is the fact that its as grand an endeavor as the very character at its heart and manages to pull off quite a bit of it. The scene of the now-rat infested apartment set towards the end of the movie broke my heart. I'm not sure there was a more poignant vision of the cobwebs of the past invading memory than that in any other film this year.

And if "Little Person" doesn't absolutely exemplify what a 'Best Original Song' is supposed to, I simply don't understand the category.

Edited By flipp525 on 1262312920
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell

User avatar
Sonic Youth
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 7687
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: USA

Postby Sonic Youth » Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:32 am

If the decade still has one year to go, then why did he include a film from 2000, which would be from the previous decade?

Let me explain how it works already, so that everyone and Greg understands.

The 21st century is from 2001-2100. However, the 2000s are from 2000-2099. Then we enter the 2100s.

Similarly, the first decade of the 21st century is from 2001-2010. However, the '00s are from 2000-2009. 2010 is the beginning of the '10s. So when people are talking about the best of the decade, they're talking about the '00s. Done. Nothing more need be said. If you still have an issue, take it up with Zach. He schooled me on this ten years ago.

And Happy New Year.

Edited By Sonic Youth on 1262270034
"What the hell?"
Win Butler

User avatar
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York

Postby Damien » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:10 am

Just when I'm feeling kind of warm and snuggly to Ebert because of his health problems and his political screeds, he comes along and writes something like tis. And once again I'm forced to state that the man is an idiot
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell

User avatar
Posts: 2723
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Postby Eric » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:35 am

I'm precisely the opposite. There are definitely a dozen or so movies I could live with calling my favorite movie of the decade, but there is only one contender for the slot of the worst. I hardly need to name it here, I trust.

Posts: 3433
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL

Postby dws1982 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:14 am

Sabin wrote:The other top films of the decade follow, with a nod to the fact that the decade still has one year to go. If it doesn't, you were two on your first birthday.

Well then wait until next year, Roger.

Synecdoche New York will probably be on one of my end-of-decade lists, but not a list for the best films. It'll be hard to decide on a worst of the decade (so many to choose from, and without having seen many of the obvious candidates), but that will be in the running. Meanwhile, my best of the decade is pretty much set in stone, and I'd be absolutely stunned to see my number one film knocked out.

Edited By dws1982 on 1262240713

Tenured Laureate
Posts: 9046
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am

Postby Sabin » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:48 am

Wrong Kaufman. It's high up on my list though.

The best films of the decade

By Roger Ebert on December 30, 2009 3:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)

"Synecdoche, New York" is the best film of the decade. It intends no less than to evoke the strategies we use to live our lives. After beginning my first viewing in confusion, I began to glimpse its purpose and by the end was eager to see it again, then once again, and I am not furnished. Charlie Kaufman understands how I live my life, and I suppose his own, and I suspect most of us. Faced with the bewildering demands of time, space, emotion, morality, lust, greed, hope, dreams, dreads and faiths, we build compartments in our minds. It is a way of seeming sane.

The mind is a concern in all his screenplays, but in "Synecdoche" (2008), his first film as a director, he makes it his subject, and what huge ambition that demonstrates. He's like a novelist who wants to get it all into the first book in case he never publishes another. Those who felt the film was disorganized or incoherent might benefit from seeing it again. It isn't about a narrative, although it pretends to be. It's about a method, the method by which we organize our lives and define our realities.

Very few people live their lives on one stage, in one persona, wearing one costume. We play different characters. We know this and accept it. In childhood we begin as always the same person but quickly we develop strategies for our families, our friends, our schools. In adolescence these strategies are not well controlled. Sexually, teenagers behave one way with some dates and a different way with others. We find those whose have a persona that matches one of our own, and that defines how we interact with that person. If you aren't an aggressor and are sober, there are girls (or boys) you do it with and others you don't, and you don't want those people to discover what goes on away from them.

But already "Synecdoche" has me thinking in terms of the film's insight. That is its power. Let me stand back and consider it as a movie. It's about a theater director named Caden Cotard (Philip Seymour Hoffman), who begins with a successful regional production, is given a MacArthur genius grant, and moves with a troupe of actors into a New York warehouse. Here they develop a play that grows and grows, and he devises a set representing their various rooms and lives. The film begins as apparently realistic, but as the set expands it shades off into -- complexity? fantasy? chaos?

In the earlier scenes, he was married to Adele (Catherine Keener). She leaves, and he marries Claire (Michelle Williams), who to some degree is intended to literally replace the first wife, as many second spouses are. Why do some people marry those who resemble their exes? They're casting for the same role. Caden has hired an actor named Daniel London (Tom Noonan) to star in the play, as a character somewhat like himself. Many writers and directors create fiction from themselves, and are often advised to.

What happens in the film isn't supposed to happen in life. The membrane between fact and fiction becomes permeable, and the separate lives intermingle. Caden hardly seems to know whose life he's living; his characters develop minds of their own. How many authors have you heard say their dialogue involves "just writing down what the characters would say?"

Living within different personas is something many people do. How can a governor think to have a mistress in Argentina? An investment counselor think to steal all the money entrusted to him? A famous athlete be revealed as a sybarite? A family man be discovered to have two families? I suspect such people, and to some degree many of us, find no more difficulty in occupying those different scenarios that we might find eating meat some days and on others calling ourselves vegetarian.

"Synecdoche" is accomplished in all the technical areas, including its astonishing set. The acting requires great talent to create characters who are always in their own reality, however much it shifts. Philip Seymour Hoffman's character experiences a deterioration of body, as we all do, finds it more difficult to see outside himself, as we all do, and becomes less sure of who "himself' is, as sooner or later we all do. He shows us this process with a precise evolution.

Kaufman has made the most perceptive film I can recall about how we live in the world. This is his debut as a director, but his most important contribution is the screenplay. Make no mistake: He sweated blood over this screenplay. Somebody had to know what was happening on all those levels, and that had to be the writer. Of course he directed it. Who else could have comprehended it?

My blog entry about the film and Charlie Kaufman

The other top films of the decade follow, with a nod to the fact that the decade still has one year to go. If it doesn't, you were two on your first birthday. Titles link to my reviews.

2. "The Hurt Locker" (2009). A film that concerns not the war but the warrior. It's set in Iraq, and by nature we identify with the hero, James (Jeremy Renner). But it focuses not on the enemy but on the bomb disposal expert himself, who risks his life hundreds of times when the slightest mistake would mean maiming or death. "War is a drug," the opening titles tell us. The man's comrades are angry with him for the chances he takes. He considers bomb disposal a battle of the wits between himself and the designer. Yes, but the designer is not there if a bomb explodes. He is. Yet he volunteers.

The others in his group are professional soldiers. They're good at their jobs, faithful to their mission, and prudently follow military procedure. James's behavior is an affront to them, mocking their caution. That is Bigelow's most effective device: Instead of objectifying the enemy, she internalizes the fear. The anxiety of the the men about James is infectious. They fear, and we fear. They grow restless and resentful, and it enhances his danger.

Apart from this psychological process, Katherine Bigelow's film has a masterful command of editing, tempo, character and photography. Using no stunts and CGI, she creates a convincing portrayal of the conditions a man like James faces. She builds with classical tools. She evokes suspense, dread, identification. She asks if a man like James requires such a fearsome job. The film is a triumph of theme and execution, and very nearly flawless.

3. "Monster" (2004). An Egyptian film critic told me in disbelief that this film made him sympathize with a serial killer. I knew what he meant. We are enjoined to love not the sin but the sinner. Patty Jenkins' film is based on the life of Aileen Wuornos, a damaged woman who committed seven murders. It doesn't excuse the murders. It asks that we witness the woman's final desperate attempt to be a better person than her fate intended.

Charlize Theron's performance in the role is one of the great performances in the history of the cinema. She transforms herself into a character with an uncanny resonance to the real Aileen Wuornos -- but mere impersonation isn't as difficult as embodying another person. Aileen, abused all of her life, knows she is doing evil but is driven to it by her deep need to provide for another person, her lover Selby (Christina Ricci), as she was never provided for herself. This doesn't justify murder in her mind, but she believes it's necessary. We disagree. But we're asked to empathize with her ruined soul, and because of Theron and Jenkins, we find that possible. She becomes pitiful, not hateful.

4. "Juno" (2007). One of a kind, a film that delighted me from beginning to end, never stepping wrong with its saucy young heroine who faces an unexpected pregnancy with forthright boldness. To be sure, life doesn't always provide parents and an adoptive mother for the baby as comforting as Juno's. But Jason Reitman's second feature doesn't set out to be realistic; it's a fable about how the sad realities of teen pregnancy might be transformed in a good-hearted world. Ellen Page creates a character to be long cherished, a smart, articulate, 16-year-old who keeps a brave front and yet deeply feels what she's going through.

Juno's dialog is so nimble and funny that some said no real person thinks that fast and talks that well. Real people may not. Juno does. The original screenplay by Diablo Cody is pitch-perfect comedy writing, assuming the audience is as intelligent as Juno. Have you noticed how many stupid people are presented as normal, especially in mainstream comedies? I was surprised how much I laughed during "Juno," and then surprised how much I cared, especially during a luminous scene when the woman who will adopt her baby (Jennifer Garner) solemnly places her hand on Juno's pregnant belly and the two exchange a look so beautiful that if I'd known it was coming I don't know if I could have looked.

5. "Me and You and Everyone We Know" (2005). Another extraordinary film centered on a woman. Is it possible that women in the movies embody emotion more readily than men, who tend more toward external action? Women as wildly different as Aileen Wuornos, Juno and Christine, the heroine of Miranda July's film, are tuned to inner channels that drive them with feeling, not plots. This first feature shows a certainty about the tone it wants to strike, which is of fragile magic. We don't learn a lot about Christine -- more, actually, about Richard (John Hawkes), the awkward shoe salesman she likes -- but the story's not about her life, it's about how love, for her, requires someone who speaks your rare emotional language, a language of whimsy and daring, of playful mind games and bold challenges.

Imagine Christine and Richard as they walk down the street. Still strangers She suggests that the block they are walking down is their lives. And now, she says, they're halfway down the street and halfway through their lives. Before long they will be at the end. It's impossible to suggest how poetic this scene is; when it's over, you think, that was a perfect scene, and no other scene can ever be like it. And we are all on the sidewalk. July's film fits no genre, fulfills no expectations, creates its own rules, and seeks only to share a strange, lovable mind with us.

6. "Chop Shop" (2008). Here is the third world, thriving under the flight path to LaGuardia. Ale (Alejandro Polanco), a 12-year-old boy, works for the owner of an auto repair shop in an area few New Yorkers know about: Willets Point, square blocks of auto and tire shops that hustle for business. He's an orphan, dreaming of being reunited with his 16-year-old sister. He steals a little, cons a little, sells pirated DVDs, and mostly works hard. He lives in a room knocked together in the crawl space of the shop. He's not educated, but is bright, resourceful, and happy.

Poised on the edge of adolescence, he senses changes coming. His sister (Isamar Gonzales) moves in with him, and he proudly tries to support her--to be the man in the family they lost. Director Ramin Bahrani observed Willets Point for a year and worked with two non-actors to achieve remarkably fluent and convincing performances. His film is a vibrant modern equivalent of the Italian Neorealist classics like "Shoeshine." It stays resolutely within its story, never making the mistake of drawing conclusions. It's riveting, entertaining, unforgettable. Bahrani, an Iranian-American born in Winston-Salem, N.C., has made three films (including "Man Push CArt" and "Goodbye Solo") and all three have made my Best Ten lists. In my opinion, he's the new director of the decade.

7. "The Son" (2002). In a career filled with great films, "Le Fils" by Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne is stunning. It focuses intensely on two characters: Olivier (Olivier Gourmet), a Belgian carpenter, and Francis (Morgan Marinne), a young apprentice that a social worker wants to place with him. Olivier refuses. The moment they leave, Olivier scurries after them like a feral animal, spies on them through a door opening and leaps onto a metal cabinet to look through a high window. Then he says he will take the boy.

That's all I choose to say. What connects them is revealed so carefully and deliberately that any hint would diminish the experience. Once again, as with all the films on this list, writing and acting are crucial. Yes, they're well directed, but you know, there are a lot of fine directors. There's a scene here where Francis and Olivier are working in a lumber warehouse, shifting and loading heavy planks. We know enough by then to invest the scene with meaning. The Dardennes achieve their effect primarily through sound: the raw, harsh sound of one plank upon another. I can think of many ways to film such a scene, none better.

8. "The 25th Hour" (2003). A film about the last 24 hours of freedom for Monty Brogan (Edward Norton), a convicted drug dealer. He lives in a heightened state. He focuses on the remaining important things: His lover, his father, his best friends. Spike Lee, working with David Benioff's adaptation of his own novel, gives adequate screen time to all the people in Monty's life, so that we see him as part of an ending world. Their lives will continue but, his friends agree, they will never see Monty again, Not the Monty they know.

The film avoid crime-movie cliches. It's about the time remaining. Lee reflects Monty's acute awareness of this with scenes of startling inventiveness, one an angry monolog delivered to a mirror, another a shared fantasy as his father (Brian Cox) drives him to prison. Too many movies now require their expensive stars to be onscreen in almost every frame. "The 25th Hour" is enriched by supporting performances, notably by Philip Seymour Hoffman as a pudgy English teacher, not accustomed to drinking, who makes a devastating mistake involving appearance and reality. Spike Lee writes eloquently with his camera in strategies that are anything but conventional.

9. "Almost Famous" (2000). The story of a 15-year-old kid (Patrick Fugit), smart and terrifyingly earnest, who through luck and pluck gets assigned by Rolling Stone magazine to do a profile of a rising rock band. The magazine has no idea he's 15. Clutching his pencil and his notebook like talismans, phoning a veteran critic for advice, he plunges into the experience that will make and shape him. It's as if Huckleberry Finn came back to life in the 1970s, and instead of taking a raft down the Mississippi, got on the bus with the band. I was hugging myself as I watched it: This is my story. Well, except in the details.

Cameron Crowe, the writer-director, was inspired by his own experiences, here transformed by an ability to step outside the first person and clearly see the hero's mother (Francis McDormand), a band groupie (Kate Hudson), the lead singer (Jason Lee) and the veteran journalist (Philip Seymour Hoffman, again). This is a coming of age story with the feel of plausible experience, because when you're 15 even the most implausible things seem likely if they're happening to you.

10. "My Winnipeg" (2008). If I said "Almost Famous" was my life, would you believe "My Winnipeg" tells the history of my home town? All except for the details -- which, for that matter, don't particularly pertain to Winnipeg, either. Guy Maddin's films are like a silent movie dreaming it can speak. No frame of his work could be mistaken for anyone else's. He combines documentary, lurid melodrama, newsreels, feverish fantasies and tortured typography into a form that appears to contain urgent information. His sound tracks are sometimes clear narration, sometimes soap opera, sometimes snatches that seem heard over a radio from long ago and far away. The effect is hypnotic.

The city fathers of Winnipeg asked Maddin, their famous local filmmaker, to direct a documentary on their city. God knows what they thought of it. Now they can reassure the taxpayers it's one of the best films of the decade. There are perhaps sights, sounds and even facts in "My Winnipeg" that are accurate, but how can you be sure when some of the most sensible elements are false and the most incredible are true? This is the story of everyone's home town; we piece it together in childhood and in some sense continue to regard it as true even when it isn't. His beliefs about secret parallel taxi companies operating along invisible alleys are as reasonable as my own beliefs about the Bone Yard in Urbana-Champaign -- which is after all only a drainage ditch, but you can't tell me that.

Those ten, and these ten, alphabetically:

Spike Jonze's "Adaptation" (2002)
Werner Herzog's "The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call, New Orleans" (2009)
Fernando Meirelles' "City of God" (2002)
Paul Haggis's "Crash" (2004)
Quentin Tarantinio's "Kill Bill Vols.1 and 2" (2003 + 2004)
Steven Spielberg's "Minority Report (2002)
The Coen Brothers' "No Country for Old Men" (2007)
Guillermo del Toro's "Pan's Labyrinth" (2006)
Carlos Reygadas' "Silent Light" (2009), .
Richard Linklater's "Waking Life" (2001)

And this reflection: All of these films are on this list for the same reason: The direct emotional impact they made on me. They have many other qualities, of course. But these evoked the emotion of Elevation, which I wrote about a year or so ago. Elevation is, scientists say, an actual emotion, not a woo-woo theory. I believe that, because some films over the years have evoked from me a physical as well as an intellectual or emotional response.

In choosing the list, I decided to bypass films that may have qualified for their historical, artistic, popular or "objective" importance. No lists have deep significance, but even less lists composed to satisfy an imaginary jury of fellow critics. My jury resides within. I know how I feel.

Almost the first day I started writing reviews, I found a sentence in a book by Robert Warshow that I pinned on the wall above my desk. I have quoted it so frequently that some readers must be weary of it, but it helps me stay grounded. It says:

A man goes to the movies. A critic must be honest enough to admit he is that man.

That doesn't make one person right and another wrong. All it means is that you know how they really felt, not how they thought they should feel.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough." ~ FDR

Return to “2000 - 2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest