Best Actor 1931/32

1927/28 through 1997
Post Reply

Best Actor 1931/32

Wallace Beery - The Champ
3
18%
Alfred Lunt - The Guardsman
2
12%
Fredric March - Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
12
71%
 
Total votes: 17

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19319
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Best Actor 1931/32

Post by Big Magilla »

Here's something interesting.

In Wallace Beery's L.A. Times obituary dated April 17, 1949, his Oscar is referred to as a "special Academy Award" which makes sense because he actually received 1-3 votes less than Fredric March but this is not a reference I've seen before. I'm wondering now if Beery's win was originally recorded as something "special" but changed somewhere along the way to an actual win in the record books.

http://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries ... story.html
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6377
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

I haven't seen the other two so I'll refrain from voting but I have to comment here that I'm surprised by how far they went with Mr. Hyde in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in 1932. Fredric March definitely deserved that Oscar.
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Alfred Lunt is just horrendous in The deplorable The Guardsman, playing to the back row of the balcony. (His wife of convenience is equally bad.)

In The Champ, Wallace Beery is beginning to show some of the Aw Shucks mannerisms that would pretty much define jis later career. He's still affecting in the shameless, The Champ, however.

Fredric March could also be very mannered but not her. He is charming and debonair, and later extremely convincingly anguished as Dr. Jekyll,and the sheer brutishness of his Mr. Hyde remains startling some 80 years later. Outstanding work, and highly deserving of the award.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Reza
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10031
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 11:14 am
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan

Post by Reza »

March is an easy choice here. Beery is good and keeps the ham in check for the most part. Yes, the Lunt's reputation cannot be judged by this film alone........he is over-the-top here but it could be the part. What worked for them on stage appears quite hideous and artificial on camera.

My top picks of 1932:

Fredric March, Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde
Paul Muni, I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang
William Powell, One Way Passage
Maurice Chevalier, Love Me Tonight
John Barrymore, A Bill of Divorcement




Edited By Reza on 1295588757
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19319
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

I have very warm memories of the Lunt-Fontanne version of The Magnificent Yankee but it was ages ago - well, 45 years ago, anyway.

It wasn't unitl much later that the saw the ghastly Guardsman, but it was the moth-eaten Molnar play which no one, not even Maggie Smith and Christopher Plummer in a more recent version called Lily in Love, could breathe life into.
Mister Tee
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8637
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by Mister Tee »

Only three nominees make the discussion brief.

I assume most would agree with Magilla, that Muni in Scarface is a major omission. But, truth be told, I've never been much able to warm up to Scarface (and I'm one who loves a good number of Hawks' films), and my limited love for Muni would be saved for the following year anyway.

It'd be nice to have more on-film record of the Lunts, to judge whether their lofty reputations are deserved. (I did see their TV version of The Magnificent Yankee, but it was back when I was in grade school, so my opinion is of no value). This ghastly, almost unwatchable film is all there is of their official cinema, and from this evidence you'd presume they stunk on ice. Fontanne isn't much, but Lunt is totally insufferable.

The Champ is shameless and dated, but it's put me away every time I've watched. Jackie Cooper is probably the better of the two actors, but Beery is quite good as well, and it's no outrage he shared this award.

But Fredric March was pretty clearly deserving here -- impressive both as Jekyll (pronounced GEE-KUL in this version) and the make-up-boosted Hyde. And the film is one of the earliest American sound films to really feel like it belongs to an art form -- Mamoulian's choices (beginning with that opening subjective-view shot) and the pre-Code sexiness of Miriam Hopkins' part of the story make it far more interesting than the other films contending for prizes that year. March gets my enthusiastic vote.
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19319
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Post by Big Magilla »

Just three nominees this year as well as the next two.

As far as I'm concerned you can toss out Alfred Lunt's stage-bound performance in The Guardsman.

As most of us know, the official tie between Wallace Beery in The Champ and Fredric March in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was actually a win by March, with Beery's supporters pushing for a declared tie since he lost by only three votes.

Since I previously voted for Beery, March, in one his best performances, is my easy pick here.

Others who should have been considered include Paul Muni in Scarface; Edward G. Robinson in Five Star Final; Lionel Barrymore in Broken Lullaby and Maurice Chevalier in One Hour With You and considering there was no supporting category to place them in, Jackie Cooper in The Champ and Boris Karloff in Frankenstein.
Post Reply

Return to “The Damien Bona Memorial Oscar History Thread”