For me the most unfortunate omission wasn't Barbara Hershey but Susan Sarandon in Bull Durham.
Amen to that. And let me officially state that I adored Melanie Griffith in Working Girl (which also contains one of Harrison Ford's best performances).
For me the most unfortunate omission wasn't Barbara Hershey but Susan Sarandon in Bull Durham.
--Damien wrote:By the way, shouldn't the posts in this discussion be moved to 1988 Oscar Shouldabeens?
I can´t understand Magilla why she didn´t fullfil the 5th slot instead of Melanie Griffith.Dianne Wiest dominated critics' awards with Hannah, makign Hershey clearly a second choice in most people's minds and her starrign role in A World Apart came in 1988 which as others have said was a year of an embarsamment of riches in the best actress race.
--Precious Doll wrote:--Hustler wrote:Hershey´s snub that year was one of the biggest mistakes in the Academy´s history.
I think a bigger snub occured the following year (or was it 1988) for A World Apart.
--Hustler wrote:Hershey´s snub that year was one of the biggest mistakes in the Academy´s history.
--rudeboy wrote:--Reza wrote:The Academy goofed up big time. Rowlands should have been nominated.
I wouldn't disagree with this, but 1988 was something of an embarassment of riches as far as leading female performances were concerned. Other than Melanie Griffith (like the film but her voice drives me crazy) any of the nominees were very worthy... and arguments could be made for Carmen Maura, Michelle Pfeiffer, Jamie Lee Curtis, Christine Lahti, Susan Sarandon, Barbara Hershey, Jodhi May... I'm sure there are others.
Reza wrote:The Academy goofed up big time. Rowlands should have been nominated.