They also refused to nominate THE SHAPE OF WATER the same year as DUNKIRK as well as snubbing ARRIVAL the year before.Sabin wrote:True. But Dunkirk didn't get nominated either.Mister Tee wrote
2) There's been a recent, slightly odd tendency in this category to shy away from the obvious big-ticket choices. This is especially true when it comes to wins -- Gladiator over The Perfect Storm? Hugo over the Apes movie? Not to denigrate 1917 or First Man's achievements, but their Oscars wouldn't be possible had not a certain number of voters seemed to have ruled out Marvel and DC movies from the get-go. Super-duper hit Black Panther couldn't even get a nomination.
This might actually work against Tenet. The more I think about it, the less sure I am that Tenet has what it takes for even a nomination.
Still, I agree with Mister Tee's overall point.
I would love to see the category become more about the best use of special effects rather than the biggest f/x budget. For example, CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON should have won the Oscar since the special effects better served the story and were more masterfully integrated into each scene compared to the expensive but laughably bad looking CGI used in GLADIATOR.
In that sense, maybe MANK and WELCOME TO CHECHNYA deserve nominations more than BLOODSHOT or LOVE & MONSTERS.