The Official Review Thread of 2018

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5179
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:08 am

ISLE OF DOGS
Cast: Bryan Cranston, Koyu Rankin, Edward Norton, Bob Balaban, Bill Murray, Jeff Goldblum, Konichi Nomura, Greta Gerwig, Frances McDormand, Scarlett Johansson, Harvey Keitel, Liev Schreiber, Akira Ito, F. Murray Abraham, Tilda Swinton, Yoko Ono, Akira Takayama, Ken Watanabe, Courtney B. Vance, Kara Hayward (voices).
Dir: Wes Anderson.

After an outbreak of dog flu, the dog-hating mayor of a futuristic/retro Japanese city decrees all dogs be moved to a remote island. A young boy flies to the island looking for his beloved pooch. I have to say this is my favorite film of the year so far. I am a huge Wes Anderson fan and I pretty much have liked or loved most of his films. This is yet another jewel in his oeuvre. I'm also a fan of Japanese cinema and as such, there's plenty to love here since it's such a loving tribute. The animation is gorgeous and the voice cast is superb. A quick word about the minor controversy surrounding this film, which seems to have died down now: I'm not Japanese but I am of Asian descent and I found nothing wrong about this film. It's simply a beautifully well-told story, no more, no less.

Oscar Prospects: Since its competition seems to be sequels, I think this could WIN Best Animated Feature. Deserves nominations for Production Design and Original Score as well.

Grade: A.

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 2969
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby dws1982 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 9:08 am

True, but I feel like they could've at least done with A Ghost Story (which I personally didn't care for) what they did with It Comes At Night--push it out wide on opening weekend so you at least get some money then, even if bad word-of-mouth kills it after that. They're not as bad as Sony Pictures Classics, but they need to do better.

User avatar
Precious Doll
Tenured
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Sat Jun 02, 2018 9:02 am

To be fair A Ghost Story & Good Time would be hard to market. One of the things I think going against A Ghost Story every breaking out is word of mouth, which I imagine would be mixed at best. The few people I know who saw it didn't like it and I wouldn't recommend to anyone for fear that they wouldn't appreciate it (to be honest I didn't myself) and then ignore me when I recommended something that was more accessible. I wouldn't have a clue after more than 40 years of film going how to market a film but it was a real shame that nobody could come up with a good marketing campaign for Good Time and what business it has done appears to be purely word of mouth. They had a potential breakout hit with that one and dropped the ball.

Lean on Pete is coming my way in late June but I've opted to purchase the UK Blu Ray instead, whilst I doubt that the Schrader film will even get a local release in any form. The last Schrader film to get a big screen release was either The Walker or Auto Focus. Everything he has made since as been straight to video and that market is on its last legs.
"I have no interest in all of that. I find that all tabloid stupidity" Woody Allen, The Guardian, 2014, in response to his adopted daughter's allegations.

dws1982
Tenured
Posts: 2969
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby dws1982 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:42 am

Unfortunately I don't have much faith that First Reformed will ever play around me. A24's Lean on Pete only made it to Nashville, at a time when I couldn't get up there to see it, and right now the Belcourt doesn't have First Reformed on their docket at all.

On a related note, can we admit that, unless it's an Oscar contender, A24 is not that great of a distributor? Almost every movie of theirs, I look at it and think of what a Focus or a Fox Searchlight might have done. They've only had eight movies gross more than $10 million--and only Lady Bird has cracked $30 million. Just last year Good Time and A Ghost Story had really strong reviews. Their combined gross was less than the "flop" Solo made on Thursday alone. A better distributor could've at least gotten a decent opening (i.e., bottom half of the weekend top ten) before it dropped off. So many other movies of theirs have topped out in the $5 million range (or below) despite having enough mainstream appeal to at least do better than that.

The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 4175
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby The Original BJ » Sat Jun 02, 2018 12:31 am

It's flown a bit under the radar, but I wanted to recommend First Reformed as a film worth seeking out -- I think it's one of the stronger efforts of the year so far. It's quite a sad film -- I think there's barely a laugh in the whole movie -- but despite dealing with heavy subject matter, it doesn't wallow in misery. Schrader's touch as a director has a lot to do with this, as the film's reserved style lets the story play out more as elegy than melodrama.

The film's plot doesn't exactly barrel along, and there were one or two detours that didn't quite work for me (the fantasy sequence certainly), but the film is more focused on character and mood, and a central narrative gradually emerges to take the film toward a fairly gripping climax. Along the way it deals with a lot of prescient issues -- the conflict between religion and politics (specifically on a subject -- the environment -- where that nexus hasn't been excessively explored), the tension between fading small-town America and modern culture (the flip phone -- itself a relic at this point -- for Hawke's character is a nice touch), the way citizens of our world seem to be wrestling with the feeling that life on our planet is getting worse and not better. And the contrast between the two churches -- the old historical landmark and the megachurch -- provides for a compelling portrait of intra-faith religious differences. (And the details Schrader uses to characterize the environments of both churches are spot-on -- the megachurch youth leader, for instance, is perfectly cast.)

This is Ethan Hawke's strongest work in some time, playing a (literally) buttoned-up character bottling up a lot of his own anger and pain while attempting to present the more measured image expected of him in his job. (And of course it crossed my mind that Hawke playing a man of the cloth would have fulfilled Damien's wildest dreams.) And this is a nice change of pace role for Amanda Seyfried, who doesn't typically get to play material this serious.

The ending is obviously open to interpretation, though it strikes me that there are really only two ways one could interpret it. Both seem to have religious/spiritual connotations, and without going too deep into spoilers, it may well be a Rorschach test for how optimistic or pessimistic one is about the future of the world these days.

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5179
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat May 26, 2018 10:01 am

SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY
Cast: Alden Ehrenreich, Woody Harrelson, Emilia Clarke, Donald Glover, Paul Bettany, Joonas Suotamo, Thandie Newton, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Erin Kellyman, Jon Favreau, Linda Hunt, Warwick Davis.
Dir: Ron Howard.

This is the spin-off film that's basically the origin story of Han Solo. Did we really need to know how he met Chewbacca or Lando Calrissian or he got the Millennium Falcon? No, we don't but here we are. The intriguing behind-the-scenes drama aside, this film isn't the huge mess it had the potential of being. It's a competently made blockbuster, as what can be expected from a Ron Howard movie. But as far as Star Wars movies go, this is definitely only a notch higher than the prequels in terms of quality. I mean, it's not offensive, just largely forgettable. The saving graces are Donald Glover as young Lando who I wished this movie was about and his droid L3-37 who's probably the best droid character in all the movies. I'm looking forward to their inevitable spin-off movie. Overall, neither a disaster nor a triumph. Just okay.

Oscar Prospects: Visual Effects is possible.

Grade: B-

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5179
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat May 19, 2018 7:49 am

EARLY MAN
Cast: Eddie Redmayne, Tom Hiddleston, Maisie Williams, Timothy Spall, Miriam Margolyes, Nick Park (voices).
Dir: Nick Park.

A tribe of cavemen find themselves having to play a big football match for a right to keep their home in the valley against the more advanced Bronze age players. This is the latest from Aardman and they usually do great work. I love the Wallace & Gromit shorts and the Shaun the Sheep movie was superb. This is a significant step down unfortunately. It has its charming moments of course. There are funny parts, the stop-motion animation is always something to see and Tom Hiddleston is really good as the main villain. But I simply wasn't taken by this at all. I found it rather dull and too derivative. I will say this is for Aardman completists only.

Oscar Prospects: Animated Feature and Original Song (I think) are possible.

Grade: C

DEADPOOL 2
Cast: Ryan Reynolds, Josh Brolin, Morena Baccarin, Julian Denniston, Zazie Beetz, T.J. Miller, Leslie Uggams, Brianna Hildebrand, Jack Kesy, Eddie Marsan, Rob Delaney.
Dir: David Leitch.

The second installment of the hit R-rated superhero movie franchise has Deadpool protecting a young boy mutant from a time-travelling super soldier named Cable who wants to murder him as a child to save his family. I enjoyed the first film but I didn't think it was the Second Coming like a lot of fan boys did. This second installment is more of the same where they amp up the violence and the snarky meta humor. If you enjoyed the first one and like that kind of stuff, there's no reason to believe you won't enjoy this. I did. I had a good time but I can see someone getting tired of this type of thing fast. It would be interesting to see if they can make a third one without feeling repetitive and tired.

Oscar Prospects: Makeup is possible. So is Original Song ("Ashes").

Grade: B

User avatar
Precious Doll
Tenured
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Fri May 18, 2018 3:18 am

Thanks for the link to the article Franz. Read through it whilst waiting at the vet getting my three cats vaccinated for their flu shots. It was very interesting reading and had a good overall perspective on Queer Cinema since the dark days of AIDs (that sadly are still with us).

Probably the only person that comes to mind making totally out there Queer cinema is Bruce La Bruce, with very much mixed results I'm afraid. His 2013 film Gerontophilla, the most accessible film La Bruce has made to date, is so sweet but audiences who flocked to Love, Simon would be running for the exits on mass if they happened upon it. I was surprised that God's Own Country wasn't mentioned in the article though. It's a film that seems to have struck a cord with audiences but had the misfortune of being released in 2017 - the year of Call My By Your Name, so never really broke through to a winder audience, though I must confess that it left he as cold as the environment that it is set in.
"I have no interest in all of that. I find that all tabloid stupidity" Woody Allen, The Guardian, 2014, in response to his adopted daughter's allegations.

Franz Ferdinand
Adjunct
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Franz Ferdinand » Thu May 17, 2018 11:54 am

Going back to the Simon thoughts, this quote is from a longer piece on Queer Cinema.

Beyond discourse, the question of what makes a film queer has become subsumed by aesthetics and narratives that display a straight gaze. The most egregious example is one of the most recent: Love, Simon, a gay bildungsroman whose political and moral center is that its protagonist Simon is Not That Kind of Gay. Simon is a blandly handsome high-school teenager (Nick Robinson) who spends much of the film assuring the (hetero) audience that he’s just like them. “For the most part, my life is totally normal,” he says in the expository voice-over. He lives in a big two-story house; his parents are played by L.L.Bean catalogue models Jennifer Garner and Josh Duhamel; he gets a car with a big red ribbon on it for his birthday like a holiday car commercial. “I’m just like you except I have one huge-ass secret,” he says. “Nobody knows I’m gay.”

So what kind of gay is he not? Well, he’s certainly not like the only out gay student at his school named Ethan, a black femme student (Clark Moore) who delivers many of the movie’s only jokes. In a scene where a couple of jocks are bullying Ethan, Simon remarks, “I wish Ethan wouldn’t make it so easy for them.” When Ethan and Simon finally talk in the end, rather than have Ethan push back against just how good Simon has it, the film whiffs and has Ethan act as a sympathetic shoulder to lean on. Ethan remains a patsy, offering reassurance rather than resistance to the implicit assumption that Simon is “relatable” precisely because he’s white, masculine, and upper-middle class. The gravest injustice in Love, Simon is that a gay white boy couldn’t have grown up like a straight white boy.

It’s easy to castigate Love, Simon, but it’s the middlebrow iteration of a widespread sensibility that trades in sentimentality as a way to render LGBT people sympathetic


The entire article is worth a read.

http://www.vulture.com/2018/05/queer-ci ... to-it.html

anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 5179
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat May 12, 2018 12:10 pm

TULLY
Cast: Charlize Theron, Mackenzie Davis, Ron Livingston, Mark Duplass, Asher Miles Fallica, Elaine Tan.
Dir: Jason Reitman.

A stressed mother of two, pregnant with her third unplanned child, hires a night nanny to help her take care of the baby. The third collaboration of Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody is somewhat of a return to form for both after tepid receptions of their previous independent of each other outings. We've had a lot of films about parenthood made but his one manages to offer a fresh perspective that's quite eye-opening and thought-provoking. There's actually a third act twist which may lose some viewers but personally I thought it was quite effective. Charlize Theron gives one of her career-best performances in this one with nice supporting turns from both Mackenzie Davis and Ron Livingston.

Oscar Prospects: Theron deserves a Best Actress. I don't know if she'll get it though. Maybe a Golden Globe nom?

Grade: B+

danfrank
Temp
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:19 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby danfrank » Wed May 09, 2018 2:00 pm

BJ's thoughts about Love, Simon are almost identical to my own. I'll just add that I found myself wishing that there were films like this when I was a gay teen, though even then my tastes were quite a bit more sophisticated than this. I also found the lead actor, Nick Robinson, quite likeable. The film is likeable enough for what it is, though there was one particularly groan-inducing scene (the ferris wheel scene, for those who have seen it) at the end. As long as they're making these types of films for the masses, I'm glad they made this one.

The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 4175
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby The Original BJ » Wed May 09, 2018 12:00 pm

The tricky thing about Love, Simon is that the very thing that makes it groundbreaking is also the exact same thing that limits it. Which is to say, it's a mainstream mall movie through and through, so the fact that a film geared to this audience (and released wide) features a gay teen protagonist makes it something of a trailblazer. And yet, in order to be a mainstream mall movie, it has to adopt a pretty vanilla teen rom com aesthetic, which makes it simultaneously feel rather generic as a creative work. All of that said, its heart is clearly in the right place, and it's got some enjoyable laughs along the way. Plus, it has an admirably diverse collection of characters, both in terms of LGBT and racial diversity -- I've heard the film characterized as "too whitebread," which strikes me as a strange complaint, given how many major characters of color fill out the movie. There's nothing here that's earth-shaking artistically, but strictly on multiplex movie terms, I found it a watchable enough two hours.

User avatar
Precious Doll
Tenured
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Precious Doll » Wed May 09, 2018 8:28 am

I really found Love, Simon so pre-calculated, middle class, safe and ultimately tepid. And at 110 minutes its way too long to sustain the flimsy material. My only interest in seeing the film was the hype surrounding the first 'major studio' gay themed teen film aimed as the masses as opposed to the 'gay ghetto market'. It's impossible to dismiss the acclaim for the film given that many film critics are much younger than I am and I can appreciate that they are coming from a totally different perspective that is not clouded by decades of far more challenging queer cinema, not only from the U.S., but on an international level as well.

U.S. queer cinema has really gone downhill this century some of which has to do with the fact that barriers already broken down during the 1980's in particular and that the nature of cinema has changed. So little gay cinema, unless by a major director, is shunted straight to DVD and/or streaming. Unfortunately, that's were most of it belongs.

I haven't seen Blockers, though I understand that it has gotten some excellent reviews but I'm trying to cut out new films that simply don't appeal to me unless there is some reason the convinces me otherwise (e.g. Love, Simon). And on top of that I can't stand Leslie Mann. She is the Lorraine Gray of the 21st century and she only appears to even have an acting career because she is married to Judd Apatow. Nepotism has always existed in the 'arts' and has produced some great talent over the years but goodness Mann must rank as the worst to ever emerge. I'm sure someone will prove me wrong with even worst examples. Disclosure: I did actually like Mann in The Other Woman.
"I have no interest in all of that. I find that all tabloid stupidity" Woody Allen, The Guardian, 2014, in response to his adopted daughter's allegations.

Sabin
Laureate
Posts: 7352
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Sabin » Wed May 09, 2018 1:00 am

Franz Ferdinand wrote
Re: Blockers and Love, Simon. One of them is an openly gay-themed movie marketed as such, while the other initially appears to be a gross-out comedy but features an un-marketed and affecting gay sub-plot handled, I thought, quite gracefully. One of the bigger surprises of the year so far.

I've been interested in watching both. Could you speak more to them.
"If you are marching with white nationalists, you are by definition not a very nice person. If Malala Yousafzai had taken part in that rally, you'd have to say 'Okay, I guess Malala sucks now.'" ~ John Oliver

Franz Ferdinand
Adjunct
Posts: 1321
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2018

Postby Franz Ferdinand » Tue May 08, 2018 2:59 pm

Re: Blockers and Love, Simon. One of them is an openly gay-themed movie marketed as such, while the other initially appears to be a gross-out comedy but features an un-marketed and affecting gay sub-plot handled, I thought, quite gracefully. One of the bigger surprises of the year so far.


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests