The Official Review Thread of 2016

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:24 pm

Greg wrote:
ITALIANO wrote:
What I meant was you call for someone to have views that go against the consensus, but, do not appreciate it when someone has views that go against your own.


Yes, Greg, I know what you meant (why have I got into this?!), and I realize - again - that you are right and that often the consensus is better. Well, there could even be a - how shall I put it - remotely RATIONAL way of being original, but you don't need to worry.

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby Greg » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:09 pm

ITALIANO wrote:
Greg wrote:
ITALIANO wrote:But maybe one day you could hate a movie which others love, or the opposite. I mean - it CAN happen. Just this.


On the other hand, I remember you being fairly bemused when I said I thought Last Tango In Paris was overrated.


True. Yes, ok, forget what I said - let's stick to the consensus.


What I meant was you call for someone to have views that go against the consensus, but, do not appreciate it when someone has views that go against your own.
"A presidency won over emails may end up lost over emails."

Ezra Klein

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:00 pm

Greg wrote:
ITALIANO wrote:But maybe one day you could hate a movie which others love, or the opposite. I mean - it CAN happen. Just this.


On the other hand, I remember you being fairly bemused when I said I thought Last Tango In Paris was overrated.


True. Yes, ok, forget what I said - let's stick to the consensus.

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby Greg » Sun Feb 19, 2017 3:49 pm

ITALIANO wrote:But maybe one day you could hate a movie which others love, or the opposite. I mean - it CAN happen. Just this.


On the other hand, I remember you being fairly bemused when I said I thought Last Tango In Paris was overrated.
"A presidency won over emails may end up lost over emails."

Ezra Klein

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:02 am

anonymous1980 wrote:There are films that people despise that I champion, Showgirls for example


I see. Mmm... Ok, well, don't worry then - go on as before.

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:22 am

ITALIANO wrote:
anonymous1980 wrote:
ITALIANO wrote:Anonymous, you are definitely a great guy and very intelligent - but really, the moment you write something which is even vaguely against the "general consensus", which doesn't feel just like a summary of what mainstream critics say about a certain movie, which flows naturally from your life experiences rather than from something you and everyone else have read - well, I swear that I will open a bottle of champagne. I'm not joking - the bottle is ready and for years now I've been reading your reviews day after day looking forward to finally open it. It's still closed, but who knows...


What do you want me to do? Hate the movie when I loved it and was moved by the film?


Of course not. I'm sure that you are very honest - as you must be. It's not that. But maybe one day you could hate a movie which others love, or the opposite. I mean - it CAN happen. Just this.


It has been known to happen on occasion. There are films that are considered classics by a lot of people that I did not care for: John Hughes's teen movies for example. There are films that people despise that I champion, Showgirls and Tim Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory for example.

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:49 am

anonymous1980 wrote:
ITALIANO wrote:Anonymous, you are definitely a great guy and very intelligent - but really, the moment you write something which is even vaguely against the "general consensus", which doesn't feel just like a summary of what mainstream critics say about a certain movie, which flows naturally from your life experiences rather than from something you and everyone else have read - well, I swear that I will open a bottle of champagne. I'm not joking - the bottle is ready and for years now I've been reading your reviews day after day looking forward to finally open it. It's still closed, but who knows...


What do you want me to do? Hate the movie when I loved it and was moved by the film?


Of course not. I'm sure that you are very honest - as you must be. It's not that. But maybe one day you could hate a movie which others love, or the opposite. I mean - it CAN happen. Just this.

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:08 am

ITALIANO wrote:Anonymous, you are definitely a great guy and very intelligent - but really, the moment you write something which is even vaguely against the "general consensus", which doesn't feel just like a summary of what mainstream critics say about a certain movie, which flows naturally from your life experiences rather than from something you and everyone else have read - well, I swear that I will open a bottle of champagne. I'm not joking - the bottle is ready and for years now I've been reading your reviews day after day looking forward to finally open it. It's still closed, but who knows...


What do you want me to do? Hate the movie when I loved it and was moved by the film?

ITALIANO
Emeritus
Posts: 3803
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: MILAN
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby ITALIANO » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:58 am

anonymous1980 wrote: Amy Adams gives one of her career-best performances in this film. Yes, I think she was robbed of an Oscar nomination. This is a film I won't soon forget.

Grade: A.


Anonymous, you are definitely a great guy and very intelligent - but really, the moment you write something which is even vaguely against the "general consensus", which doesn't feel just like a summary of what mainstream critics say about a certain movie, which flows naturally from your life experiences rather than from something you and everyone else have read - well, I swear that I will open a bottle of champagne. I'm not joking - the bottle is ready and for years now I've been reading your reviews day after day looking forward to finally open it. It's still closed, but who knows...

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:25 am

ARRIVAL
Cast: Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Forest Whitaker, Michael Stuhlbarg, Tzi Ma.
Dir: Denis Villenueve.

After a group of mysterious aliens land on various countries of planet Earth, a linguist is tasked by the U.S. government to try and communicate with them. Yes, it's one of the best movies of the year and also one of the most surprising. I've heard people who said they were moved by the third act revelations which I will not spoil and they were right. It is one of the most intelligent, engaging and moving science-fiction films of recent years, an antidote really to the loud, obnoxious versions of this genre of recent years. Amy Adams gives one of her career-best performances in this film. Yes, I think she was robbed of an Oscar nomination. This is a film I won't soon forget.

Grade: A.

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:58 pm

LITTLE SISTER
Cast: Addison Timlin, Ally Sheedy, Keith Poulson, Peter Hedges, Barbara Crampton, Kristin Slaysman, Molly Plunk.
Dir: Zach Clark.

A young nun about to take her vows goes back to her estranged family after three years when her brother comes back from the war horribly disfigured. This film has many of the bad habits I see from modern day American indie films. But the film has a heart and there's really a sweet sincerity about it that makes it difficult to dislike. Addison Timlin is terrific as the young woman about to be a nun. She actually makes her into a believable, interesting character including the revelation that she was a Goth girl as a teen. Ally Sheedy is kind of hit and miss though as the mom. Overall, still a pretty good film.

Grade: B.

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:20 pm

NOCTURNAL ANIMALS
Cast: Amy Adams, Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Shannon, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Armie Hammer, Karl Glusman, Isla Fisher, Laura Linney, Michael Sheen, Robert Aramayo, Andrea Riseborough, Ellie Bamber, Jena Malone.
Dir: Tom Ford.

A woman receives a manuscript of a novel written by her ex-husband. As she reads it, we find out it's about a man who loses his family and goes on to seek revenge. I've always wanted to see this film because of the reaction towards. For every person that thinks it's a masterpiece, there's someone who thinks this is a heaping pile of garbage. To be honest, I can sort of see the argument for both which lands me somewhere in the middle with this. It is a well-made, well-acted and intriguing neo-noir with melodramatic elements. It's as if a Douglas Sirk script mashed together with a Tarantino script. However, its rampant cynicism and largely two-dimensional characters do leave a bad taste in one's mouth. No wonder Michael Shannon got the nomination. He feels like the only fully human character in the film. You kind of wish it was about him.

Grade: B.

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:58 am

LION
Cast: Dev Patel, Sunny Pawar, Nicole Kidman, Rooney Mara, David Wenham.
Dir: Garth Davis.

Based on a true story of Saroo Brierly, who as a boy in India is separated from his older brother, gets lost and placed in an orphanage and eventually adopted by an Australian couple. As a young adult, he uses Google Earth to try and locate his Indian family. Okay, at the hands of a lesser filmmaker this would've been just a plain formulaic "inspiring" true story. However, by spending almost half the film's running time on the early life of little Saroo and the scary experience of being lost, the film actually earns its emotional heft. The sequences in India truly makes this film quite special and better than you'd expect it to be. Dev Patel, Nicole Kidman and newcomer Sunny Pawar all give beautiful performances. It's not quite a masterpiece but it's lovely, heartfelt film that can move even the most hardened cynic.

Grade: B+

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 10:02 am

WHY HIM?
Cast: James Franco, Bryan Cranston, Megan Mullally, Zoey Deutch, Keegan-Michael Key, Cedric the Entertainer, Griffin Gluck.
Dir: John Hamburg.

A straight-laced middle-aged man is horrified to learn that his daughter's foul-mouthed internet millionaire boyfriend is about to propose to her. There was nothing else in the theater I was aching to see so I just saw this as a time killer. I came in with low expectations. Surprisingly, I did find myself laughing in a few parts and I was reasonably entertained. This is thanks to the good cast who actually did their best to sell the material the best way they can. Still, this is far from a great comedy. It's overall it's just okay at best. There was definitely potential there but the film is way too long and needed tightening.

Grade: C+

anonymous1980
Emeritus
Posts: 4979
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Re: The Official Review Thread of 2016

Postby anonymous1980 » Thu Feb 02, 2017 1:36 pm

JACKIE
Cast: Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard, Billy Crudup, Greta Gerwig, John Hurt, Richard E. Grant, John Carroll Lynch, Max Casella, Beth Grant, Caspar Philippson.
Dir: Pablo Larrain.

This is a film that chronicles First Lady Jackie Kennedy as come to grips with the assassination of her husband. There have been numerous films and dramatizations of the Kennedys and the assassination of JFK. What makes this any different? Well, this film zeroes in on that first week or so after the assassination in how Jackie comes to terms with her grief and her trauma. This film does not feel like a traditional historical biopic at all (I could go so far as to say that i's an anti-biopic). Instead, it feels more like a character study about a woman whose husband got violently taken away from her and the fact that she has to go through this in the public eye. Natalie Portman gives one of her career best performances in this. I almost forget she's not Jackie at times. A fine piece of work from Chilean director Pablo Larrain.

Grade: A-


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest