The Original BJ wrote:In honor of you, Italiano, I will watch my screener of Joy again today!![]()
Merry Christmas!!!!!
I'd say Merry Christmas to you - but how merry can it be if you watch Joy AGAIN?

The Original BJ wrote:In honor of you, Italiano, I will watch my screener of Joy again today!![]()
Merry Christmas!!!!!
Sabin wrote:This film cost $60 mil and I think it's going to be a giant flop.
Sabin wrote:I think Jennifer Lawrence has a better handle on Joy than Russell does. I'm not sure this is one of her best performances but there are scenes with some of her best acting.
The Original BJ wrote
I have to say, I really think the trailers for this movie have done a terrible job marketing it -- they make the movie seem like an oddball curio, with emphasis on Jennifer Lawrence wielding a gun, when in actuality, the film is a total crowd-pleaser that I imagine could have pretty wide appeal.
HarryGoldfarb wrote:C-
Joy: EW review
Rated PG-13
Runtime 123 minutes
in a season rich with cinematic options—Star Wars, Sisters, The Revenant—this is not the joy you’re looking for. C–
The Original BJ wrote:Thank you, flipp, for confirming that I'm not completely insane for finding a lot to admire here.
Big Magilla wrote:Joy is running 53% on Rotten Tomatoes and 63% on Metacritic. Maybe it's time to forget about a fourth nomination for Jennifer Lawrence.
Greg wrote:flipp525 wrote:Also, if Mark Rylance does manage to win as Reza has been predicting, he better not do one of those very annoying little Tony speeches he does because that ain't gonna play with this crowd.
What makes his Tony speeches annoying?
Sabin wrote:Thanks, man. This is now officially the movie I'm most looking forward to again. Where do you rank this in his canon?
Also, do you think Cooper and Rossellini can get nominated? I don't know why I started to think Diane Ladd had a chance. Does she?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests