National Society of Film Critics winners

For the films of 2014
Mister Tee
Laureate
Posts: 6063
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby Mister Tee » Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:42 pm

The Original BJ wrote:
Okri wrote:
The Original BJ wrote:Once again, it's worth pointing out how lockstep critics have been this year. ONLY Picture and Cinematography differed between NY and National Society -- and in both those categories, the NY winner was the close runner-up here.

Arquette certainly cements her front-runner status -- one I hope she keeps -- though I guess I still worry about the potential for an Amy Ryan-type situation, where the televised prizes change things up dramatically (acknowledging the difference between a performance in a Best Pic frontrunner and a sole nominee.)


Intriguingly, that was the year that the Golden Globes really weren't televised. But I can imagine Arquette going the way of Virginia Madsen.


Virginia Madsen hadn't crossed my mind, but that's actually a much better comparison -- she snagged prizes from LA, NY, and NSFC (as Arquette did) in the obvious critical favorite of the year, only to stumble down the line. The performance strikes me as similar to Arquette's too -- lovely work, but not exactly the kind of role you imagine running away with the Oscar when you see it.

To be fair, Arquette could also become Melissa Leo, another performance that didn't seem like it would be a juggernaut given some strong potential competition, but which sailed all the way through awards season. Time will tell.

Further remember that, in both cases, the Broadcasters (first televised show of the year) DID go with the critical juggernaut -- Madsen & Ryan both won. It was the Globes, picking Portman and Blanchett, who changed the conversation (and then SAG further muddled things with Blanchett ('04) and Dee).

Those late twists seem to have become a thing of the past in the most recent years, possibly because there's that echo chamber of 20 local critics' groups, almost all of whom have chimed in on Arquette, the way they do on most supporting choices and make them feel inevitable (Melissa Leo being the most flagrant case, but Christopher Plummer, Anne Hathaway, Jared Leto and Christian Bale, as well).

Again I emphasize: I'll be happy if Arquette wins the Oscar. But I'll enjoy it alot more if her win isn't fore-ordained by peer pressure.

The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby The Original BJ » Sat Jan 03, 2015 9:31 pm

Okri wrote:
The Original BJ wrote:Once again, it's worth pointing out how lockstep critics have been this year. ONLY Picture and Cinematography differed between NY and National Society -- and in both those categories, the NY winner was the close runner-up here.

Arquette certainly cements her front-runner status -- one I hope she keeps -- though I guess I still worry about the potential for an Amy Ryan-type situation, where the televised prizes change things up dramatically (acknowledging the difference between a performance in a Best Pic frontrunner and a sole nominee.)


Intriguingly, that was the year that the Golden Globes really weren't televised. But I can imagine Arquette going the way of Virginia Madsen.


Virginia Madsen hadn't crossed my mind, but that's actually a much better comparison -- she snagged prizes from LA, NY, and NSFC (as Arquette did) in the obvious critical favorite of the year, only to stumble down the line. The performance strikes me as similar to Arquette's too -- lovely work, but not exactly the kind of role you imagine running away with the Oscar when you see it.

To be fair, Arquette could also become Melissa Leo, another performance that didn't seem like it would be a juggernaut given some strong potential competition, but which sailed all the way through awards season. Time will tell.

Okri
Tenured
Posts: 2504
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby Okri » Sat Jan 03, 2015 8:31 pm

The Original BJ wrote:Once again, it's worth pointing out how lockstep critics have been this year. ONLY Picture and Cinematography differed between NY and National Society -- and in both those categories, the NY winner was the close runner-up here.

Arquette certainly cements her front-runner status -- one I hope she keeps -- though I guess I still worry about the potential for an Amy Ryan-type situation, where the televised prizes change things up dramatically (acknowledging the difference between a performance in a Best Pic frontrunner and a sole nominee.)


Intriguingly, that was the year that the Golden Globes really weren't televised. But I can imagine Arquette going the way of Virginia Madsen.

The Original BJ
Emeritus
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 8:49 pm

Re: National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby The Original BJ » Sat Jan 03, 2015 5:40 pm

Once again, it's worth pointing out how lockstep critics have been this year. ONLY Picture and Cinematography differed between NY and National Society -- and in both those categories, the NY winner was the close runner-up here.

Arquette certainly cements her front-runner status -- one I hope she keeps -- though I guess I still worry about the potential for an Amy Ryan-type situation, where the televised prizes change things up dramatically (acknowledging the difference between a performance in a Best Pic frontrunner and a sole nominee.)

Mister Tee
Laureate
Posts: 6063
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby Mister Tee » Sat Jan 03, 2015 4:26 pm

Based on what we learned last year -- how all out-of-town proxies disappear after round one -- it appears Cotillard and Citizenfour were first round winners, but everything else went to later, more limited voting. Which can bring about a Goodbye to Language win, but can also ditto NY choices in any number of categories, even where there seems wider selection (I'm not in Italiano's spot on Arquette -- I think she's very good -- but given the number of worthy supporting actress candidates this year, I'm puzzled why she's everyone's choice).

Boyhood misses by only one point replicating Hurt Locker's run through the three classic critics' groups.

Mister Tee
Laureate
Posts: 6063
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

National Society of Film Critics winners

Postby Mister Tee » Sat Jan 03, 2015 4:21 pm

Picture: “Goodbye to Language” (25)
Runners-up: “Boyhood” (24); “Birdman” and “Mr. Turner” (tie, 10)

Director: Richard Linklater, “Boyhood” (36)
Runners-up: Jean-Luc Godard, “Goodbye to Language” (17); Mike Leigh, “Mr. Turner” (12)

Actor: Timothy Spall, “Mr. Turner” (31)
Runners-up: Tom Hardy, “Locke” (10); Ralph Fiennes, “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” and Joaquin Phoenix, “Inherent Vice” (tie, 9)

Actress: Marion Cotillard, “The Immigrant” and “Two Days, One Night” (80)
Runners-up: Julianne Moore, “Still Alice” (35); Scarlett Johansson, “Lucy” and “Under the Skin” (21)

Supporting actor: J.K. Simmons, “Whiplash” (24)
Runners-up: Mark Ruffalo, “Foxcatcher” (21); Edward Norton, “Birdman” (16)

Supporting actress: Patricia Arquette, “Boyhood” (26)
Runners-up: Agata Kulesza, “Ida” (18); Rene Russo, “Nightcrawler” (9)

Screenplay: Wes Anderson, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” (24)
Runners-up: Alejandro G. Inarritu, Nicolas Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris Jr., Armando Bo, “Birdman,” and Paul Thomas Anderson, “Inherent Vice” (tie, 15)

Nonfiction film: “Citizenfour” (56)
Runners-up: “National Gallery” (19); “The Overnighters” (17)

Cinematography: Dick Pope, “Mr. Turner” (33)
Runners-up: Darius Khondji, “The Immigrant” (27); Fabrice Aragno, “Goodbye to Language” (9)


Return to “87th Predictions and Precursors”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest