Best Supporting Actor

For the films of 2013
Post Reply
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19312
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by Big Magilla »

A sobering account - Barkhad Abdi is broke:

http://www.thewrap.com/oscar-nominee-ba ... -phillips/
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10740
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by Sabin »

Between Jared Leto and Matthew McConaughey, I find an interesting (did I say interesting? I mean repugnant) disparity between pointed vilification and empty enthusiasm.

Clearly before he went on, somebody sat Jared Leto down and said "Look, just write down what's important to you and say that." And I have no doubt that these things are as important to Jared Leto as they can be, but as a person, he's clearly not far off from the numbnuts that he always plays, not really know what he's doing one minute to the next. This is certainly his best speech but there's really not a whole lot there. McConaughey on the other hand has given three completely different identical speeches, which veer from tribute to the craft of acting (yes, Matthew, we appreciate your insights) to tributes to the craft of McConaugheying, which I found amusing as the awards season began and tiresome as it ends. I mean, honestly, how could one explain why it is insensitive to spend more time extolling the virtues of faith in God than anybody involved one way or another in the AIDS crisis?

So, really, what we have here are two heteronormative actors singled out for praise, despite some of the queasy ideologies innate in Dallas Buyers Club, and blatantly demonstrate that they have little awareness of the world outside themselves they were portraying.
"How's the despair?"
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by OscarGuy »

I'll take a rehearsed, prepared, egotistical speech acknowledging the plight of AIDS victims and transgender people over bloviating, bask-in-the-spotlight ass-hattery from a major star who made the moment about him and not the people his film was supposed to help and inform. You don't win Oscars for these types of performances because you're a good guy. You win because they mean something to people. When you completely ignore that, you come off as a douche. As much as I was annoyed by Leto's in-on-everything moments last night, at least he TRIED to say something important. Fuck McConaughey.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Eenusch
Graduate
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:21 am

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by Eenusch »

If you aggregated every word in the acceptance speeches by the Best Supporting Actors from 1937 to say 1967 the sum total would probably be less than what Jared Leto said tonight.
Franz Ferdinand
Adjunct
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by Franz Ferdinand »

FilmFan720 wrote:
mlrg wrote:
dws1982 wrote:I'm sure less substantial actors have won Oscars. But other than George Chakiris, it's hard to think of any.
Haing S. Ngor?
I don't think Harold Russell or Haing S. Ngor quite fit here...their stories and lack of a career were a factor in their winning.

Timothy Hutton?

Hutton was only 20 when he won so that would be fair.
I thought his speech rang false and was merely another good acting job - after his insensitive and tasteless speech at the Golden Globes, you could literally see the PR people mould him over into the Voice of the Silenced, the victims of AIDS and their Suffering. Less talk about Brazilian bubble butts and waxing, and more about pain and lost dreams. What a hack, go back to 30 Seconds on Mars.
FilmFan720
Emeritus
Posts: 3650
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by FilmFan720 »

mlrg wrote:
dws1982 wrote:I'm sure less substantial actors have won Oscars. But other than George Chakiris, it's hard to think of any.
Haing S. Ngor?
I don't think Harold Russell or Haing S. Ngor quite fit here...their stories and lack of a career were a factor in their winning.

Timothy Hutton?
"Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good."
- Minor Myers, Jr.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by OscarGuy »

I thought he was brilliant in Requiem for a Dream.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
mlrg
Associate
Posts: 1746
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by mlrg »

dws1982 wrote:I'm sure less substantial actors have won Oscars. But other than George Chakiris, it's hard to think of any.
Haing S. Ngor?
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3789
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by dws1982 »

I'm sure less substantial actors have won Oscars. But other than George Chakiris, it's hard to think of any.
User avatar
rolotomasi99
Professor
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 4:13 pm
Location: n/a
Contact:

Re: Best Supporting Actor

Post by rolotomasi99 »

Start the night with a great speech. Hopefully the rest of them will be as good.
"When it comes to the subject of torture, I trust a woman who was married to James Cameron for three years."
-- Amy Poehler in praise of Zero Dark Thirty director Kathryn Bigelow
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Best Supporting Actor

Post by OscarGuy »

Jared Leto - Dallas Buyers Club
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply

Return to “86th Nominations and Winners”