Trivia Question

For the films of 2013
Post Reply
Greg
Tenured
Posts: 3293
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by Greg »

Jackie Cooper was a little bit younger than Wallis is now by the time both Skippy and The Champ were released, but I do not know when the nominations for the films were announced.
FilmFan720
Emeritus
Posts: 3650
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Trivia Question

Post by FilmFan720 »

Is Quvenzhene Wallis the youngest person to appear in TWO Best Picture nominees?
"Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good."
- Minor Myers, Jr.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by OscarGuy »

But this all goes back to the idea that two completely different version of a film could have conceivably been nominated in one category versus the other. I'm curious if any of the major 60's and 70's films were re-edited before they hit U.S. shores since the foreign film category is the only one that really has the potential of differing versions being nominated.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Mister Tee
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8648
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by Mister Tee »

The version now available of The Act of Killing is also substantially shorter than the version first exhibited, isn't it? But, there, everyone seems to think the original was too long and this represents inmprovement.
User avatar
rolotomasi99
Professor
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 4:13 pm
Location: n/a
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by rolotomasi99 »

dws1982 wrote:Supposedly the 108-minute US version is a completely different assembly than the 130 minute Hong Kong version--re-edited from the ground up. (Probably to make it more in line with Weinstein's wishes.)
Harvey is usually a shrewd business man, but this was just an incredibly stupid move. He should have known THE GRANDMASTER was not going to be a mainstream hit like CROUCHING TIGER, HIDDEN DRAGON or HERO. This was an art house film made by a director beloved in art house crowds. I was excited to see THE GRANDMASTER on the big screen, even with the good-not-great reviews. However, once I heard about Harvey cutting the thing up so horribly, I actively boycotted it. I bet many others loyal to Kar Wai Wong likewise avoided the film as well. Meanwhile, those cuts never helped it breakout with the multiplex crowd, so what exactly did he gain?
"When it comes to the subject of torture, I trust a woman who was married to James Cameron for three years."
-- Amy Poehler in praise of Zero Dark Thirty director Kathryn Bigelow
dws1982
Emeritus
Posts: 3794
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:28 pm
Location: AL
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by dws1982 »

Supposedly the 108-minute US version is a completely different assembly than the 130 minute Hong Kong version--re-edited from the ground up. (Probably to make it more in line with Weinstein's wishes.)
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Trivia Question

Post by OscarGuy »

We're not talking about adding subtitles or whacking off a couple of minutes. The Grandmaster shown in Hong Kong was 130 minutes. The U.S. cut is 108 minutes. That's almost 30 minutes cut out...that's a LOT of editing. That's why they call him Harvey Scissorhands.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 19336
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Trivia Question

Post by Big Magilla »

In a way, just about every film nominated for Best Foreign Film is different from the version shown in the U.S. in that versions shown here are almost always either dubbed or shown with English subtitles, neither of which are part of their home country showing.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Trivia Question

Post by OscarGuy »

This is a rather unusual situation and I'm curious if it's ever happened before.

The rules for Foreign Language Film require the version shown in the country of origin is the one submitted for and nominated for the Oscar. The rules for the regular categories are that the version that plays in the U.S. must be the one nominated in those categories.

While it didn't exactly happen this year with The Grandmaster, but the U.S. version is much shorter than the Hong Kong version, so had it been nominated for Best Foreign Language Film, we would have had a situation where the version nomintaed in that category was different than the version nominated in Cinematography and Costume Design.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply

Return to “86th Nominations and Winners”