Worst of the Best: Best Actress

1998 through 2007
Post Reply

Worst of the Best: Best Actress

Gwyneth Paltrow - Shakespeare in Love
8
16%
Hilary Swank - Boys Don't Cry
0
No votes
Julia Roberts - Erin Brockovich
7
14%
Halle Berry - Monster's Ball
13
25%
Nicole Kidman - The Hours
12
24%
Charlize Theron - Monster
3
6%
Hilary Swank - Million Dollar Baby
1
2%
Reese Witherspoon - Walk the Line
4
8%
Helen Mirren - The Queen
0
No votes
Marion Cotillard - La Vie en Rose
3
6%
 
Total votes: 51

Hustler
Tenured
Posts: 2914
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires-Argentina

Post by Hustler »

My choice is Julia Roberts who stole the deserved award for Burstyn, followed by Reese Witherspoon who stole the expected award for Huffman.
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

Akash wrote:Omigod, SIX VOTES for poor Nikki Kidman and only ONE for Halle Berry (my own??)?! You people suck. Even if you absolutely hated her in The Hours, Kidman should get a pass if only for being a much better actress than Berry in every other way.
Did you see Things We Lost in the Fire? Berry is actually very good in it. That performance is better than Kidman's in her winning movie, and her work in such films as The Invasion are almost as discouraging as some of Berry's work after her win.
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

For me it's between Kidman and Roberts. Neither were horrible, but merely okay in their roles. Actually Kidman was probably a little better than okay, but she clearly didn't deserve her Oscar that year. I understand Roberts winning, as it is a star performance in a popular movie. Kidman wasn't even in the majority of her movie and most of the talk around her performance was the nose.
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
kaytodd
Assistant
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 10:16 pm
Location: New Orleans

Post by kaytodd »

Damien wrote:Halle Berry, with Theron right on her tail.
Nice image, Damien. Thanks.
The great thing in the world is not so much where we stand, as in what direction we are moving. It's faith in something and enthusiasm for something that makes a life worth living. Oliver Wendell Holmes
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10757
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

Berry. Wow. Just wow. Straight-up black-face.
"How's the despair?"
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Halle Berry, with Theron right on her tail.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Akash
Professor
Posts: 2037
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:34 am

Post by Akash »

The question is, which time? Boys Don't Cry or Million Dollar baby? Embarrassment of riches for you there, Pen. Though how anyone could choose Swank over Berry and Theron is beyond me.

Ah, I see you chose Baby. At least you left the stronger performance untouched.
Penelope
Site Admin
Posts: 5663
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Tampa, FL, USA

Post by Penelope »

Guess who I voted for....
"...it is the weak who are cruel, and...gentleness is only to be expected from the strong." - Leo Reston

"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be cultural, but it's not acceptable." - Jodie Foster
Akash
Professor
Posts: 2037
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:34 am

Post by Akash »

Omigod, SIX VOTES for poor Nikki Kidman and only ONE for Halle Berry (my own??)?! You people suck. Even if you absolutely hated her in The Hours, Kidman should get a pass if only for being a much better actress than Berry in every other way.



Edited By Akash on 1204500091
Akash
Professor
Posts: 2037
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:34 am

Post by Akash »

My god! An embarrassment of riches! The Hours is a stinker and Kidman's role borders on supporting, but her fascinating performance is actually one of the best things in the film, even if she didn't deserve to win over Julianne Moore. Julia Roberts is ridiculous in the ridiculous Erin Brockovich, but I've come to view the film as an unintentional comedy, and in that regard, her performance works. And Reese Witherspoon is just boring, winning an Oscar that should have gone to Felicity Huffman in a year where all the prizes should have gone to Q'rianka Kilcher.

So that leaves Halle Berry and Charlize Theron and my goodness, how does one choose between the awfulness of these two?? I can't stand Theron and would naturally choose her (if only because Halle Berry's crazypants reaction to winning is more fun than Theron's boring, forgettable speech) but after seeing the Aileen Wuornos documentary, I begrudgingly gained more respect for Theron's ticks and mannered performance. Berry is a sweeter, more self-effacing actress in interviews, but there's absolutely nothing in her performance. She wins.
FilmFan720
Emeritus
Posts: 3650
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:57 pm
Location: Illinois

Post by FilmFan720 »

Dense competition here, but I have to go with Kidman. Berry is a close second, though.
"Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good."
- Minor Myers, Jr.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

More.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply

Return to “The 8th Decade”