Search found 2409 matches
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:21 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: Celebrities And Politics
- Replies: 742
- Views: 42488
You mentioned Springsteen, not me. Although I do think it was shameless of Kerry to support some of the hateful stuff some celebrities came up with at one fundraising event. If you can find the quote anywhere that i specifically spoke against Springsteen, i'll give you half a point on this one. But...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:17 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
I didn't say it wasn't close, but that given the circumstances (which Clinton didn't have the second time around) where the stakes were higher. Don't tell me that running against Dole and Perot the second time around was harder than running against Kerry and protesters with a war on. It was a highl...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:45 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: The Worst President in History? - Sean Wilentz in Rolling Stone magazine
- Replies: 44
- Views: 2784
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:10 am
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
April 19, 2006 Rumsfeld Staying Put By Tom Bevan Yesterday afternoon, both the Secretary of Defense and the President made it clear: Don Rumsfeld is staying put. This is good news. For days I've been trying to wrap my head around the idea suggested by some that public support for the war in Iraq wo...
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:39 pm
- Forum: Broadcast Media
- Topic: The American Idol Thread
- Replies: 288
- Views: 21965
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:28 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: Celebrities And Politics
- Replies: 742
- Views: 42488
You're quite right. Partly. I don't think that getting up on a stage or ranting on a TV show is appropriate for celebrities. But if they are asked for their opinion, I think it's ok to say what they think. This is so, as long as name-calling isn't involved. I think George Clooney has every right to...
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:09 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
The election proved that our side was right, blah blah blah, because 52% of less than half all registered voters voted for Bush blah-blah Someone hasn't been paying attention. Bush won the election based on a number of factors, few of which had to do with support for his war policies. Both of you m...
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:03 am
- Forum: The 8th Decade
- Topic: 2005 Oscar Shouldabeens
- Replies: 85
- Views: 25218
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:57 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: Celebrities And Politics
- Replies: 742
- Views: 42488
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:53 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
I sympathize, but obviously not everyone feels the same way, since there have been many who have re-enlisted for duty in Iraq. The whole question of WMds and why we went to war was debated in the 2004 election or does no one remember this? It's not as if these same issues weren't being raised then ...
- Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:44 pm
- Forum: General Off-Topic
- Topic: Happy Birthday, anonymous
- Replies: 11
- Views: 779
- Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:35 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
Interesting
I read the article last posted and found it a tad alarming. All of the misinformation out there has been dragging President Bush down, which of course pleases many of you. But did it ever occur to any of you that if Bush loses, especially in Iraq, we all lose?
I read the article last posted and found it a tad alarming. All of the misinformation out there has been dragging President Bush down, which of course pleases many of you. But did it ever occur to any of you that if Bush loses, especially in Iraq, we all lose?
- Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:25 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: New Developments II
- Replies: 1012
- Views: 47353
- Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:59 pm
- Forum: General Off-Topic
- Topic: Happy Birthday, flipp!
- Replies: 12
- Views: 803
- Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:40 pm
- Forum: Current Events
- Topic: Next stop: Iran
- Replies: 130
- Views: 14028
Sonic, you miss a key point here. The U.S. intelligence gives the gov't its info and they take what credibility the info has and use it to make its case in any scenario. Their rationale is that it is better to be wrong about the little details than to not do anything and be wrong on the big ones (i...